sailoday28,
I am saying you should look at the options. As an engineer, you are tasked with making an educated decision, part of which is an economic evaluation. IF, the unit cannot easily be replaced or an economic payback takes too long, then your options are limited and you re-place. Technology, controls, and the use of the space has changed. Evaluate and recommend. How old is the unit? What made it fail? Lots of open questions ...
cturg,
In my case, the chillers were old, the system in the space had been re-vamped, the space was retrofitted with different coils and controls and the analysis showed that that a (read one) chiller was being used at 40% at peak load with the other units short circuting themselves. Evaluate what you have. It comes down to the owner having to live with the unit say for 20 years. If the payback in efficiency and modernization is there, it should be looked at. This falls in line with the use of VFD's. For many years, they were magical black boxes that no one wanted to pay for ... now almost all retrofits or new installs use them as cost savings. Look at your AC compressor at home. If it's at least 10 years old, it's probably a 10 SEER or less compared to 16 to 20 SEER compressors sold today. I can show a payback in 5 years or less with those numbers ... with a new warranty. The client should have the options infront of them.