acog
Electrical
- Jul 30, 2010
- 31
Hi,
I have received a fault study document. Using this document, I am trying to work out the maximum fault current which actually travels through the earthing system and returns to the upstream star point.
Typically I use the worst case single line to ground fault current for this purpose.
However, for this project I notice that the author of the network study has included a 3*I0 column for the two phase to ground fault scenario. The magnitude of this is higher than the 3*I0 single line to ground column.
I was previously under the impression that under a two phase to ground fault, majority of the fault current will return to the upstream star point through the two faulted phase conductors (and therefore not contribute to ground potential rise and can be ignored for the purposes of earthing design); however, the 3*I0 heading indicates that this is actually zero sequence current, which indicates the worst case for soil current could actually be the 2 phase to ground scenario.
Has the network study author made a mistake or is my interpretation incorrect?
If anyone can please provide some clarity on the use of two phase to ground faults in earthing studies, this would be greatly appreciated.
I have received a fault study document. Using this document, I am trying to work out the maximum fault current which actually travels through the earthing system and returns to the upstream star point.
Typically I use the worst case single line to ground fault current for this purpose.
However, for this project I notice that the author of the network study has included a 3*I0 column for the two phase to ground fault scenario. The magnitude of this is higher than the 3*I0 single line to ground column.
I was previously under the impression that under a two phase to ground fault, majority of the fault current will return to the upstream star point through the two faulted phase conductors (and therefore not contribute to ground potential rise and can be ignored for the purposes of earthing design); however, the 3*I0 heading indicates that this is actually zero sequence current, which indicates the worst case for soil current could actually be the 2 phase to ground scenario.
Has the network study author made a mistake or is my interpretation incorrect?
If anyone can please provide some clarity on the use of two phase to ground faults in earthing studies, this would be greatly appreciated.