Search results for query: *

Dhurjati Sen API 5L X60

Hi All, Code: API 1104 We have a qualified WPS with the electrode E8010-P1 (Manufacturer ESAB). We are obliged to use the electrode E8010-G (Manufacturer Lincoln Electric). According to paragraph 5.4.2.6 of API edition 2013 Addendum 2016 can we use E8010-G instead of E8010-P1 WITHOUT...

Hi metengr Thanks for your reply. Best Regards

Hi All, Subject: We have to build a sphere with ASME VIII Div.1 – This sphere will be marked with the Certification Mark with the U Designator Extracts of codes ASME BPVC.VIII.1-2017 INSPECTION AND TESTS UG-90 GENERAL (c) (1) (-i) verifying that required nondestructive examinations, impact...

Hi oknow Thanks alot for these references. Best Regards

Hi DVWE Thanks alot for this additional info. Best Regards

Hi metengr Thanks alot for your clear answer. Best Regards

Dear All, Subject: A manufacturer have to build a sphere according to ASME BPVC VIII Div.1. This sphere should be marked with the Certification Mark with U Designator. All WPSs have been prepared. Questions: 1. Is it mandatory for the manufacturer to sign their WPSs by the Authorized...

Hi DekDee ! That's what I thought. But I preferred to ask the question to have other opinions. Thank you for your answer. Best Regards

Hi everybody, Question is determination of WPS thickness range. PQR Pipe type: A 333 Gr6 Thickness T: 3.76 mm Impact test requirement: YES according to design code ASME B31.3 Welding Process: GTAW ---------------------------------- So, the WPS min/max thickness range qualified shall be? 1...

david339933, Thanks alot for your reply and explanation. Duwe6, You also, thank you for reply. Don't worry. I will not blame the client's Inspector. LOL Regards

Please correct: 50 mm + 25 mm = 75 mm ------------------------------> 2hr + 15 min = 135 min 50 mm + 25 mm + 25 mm = 100 mm ---------------------> 2hr + 15 min + 15 min = 150 min 50 mm + 25 mm + 25 mm + 25 mm = 125 mm -------------> 2hr + 15 min + 15 min + 15 min = 165 min Regards

Dear All, Can someone help me in this matter. Equipment: Sphere Design Code: ASME VIII Div.1 Shell thickness: 50.4 mm PQR qualified according to ASME IX: Material: SA 537 Cl 1 Coupon thickness: 32mm Impact Test: YES PWHT Holding Time: 240 minutes (4hr) (We planned this time to be able to do...

Dear mentengr Thanks alot. I leave open the discussion in case someone wants to intervene. Regards

Dear mentengr Thanks alot for your quick reply. But, I'm still confused and I'm still not convinced. Please, see interpretation below. Best Regards Interpretation: IX-04-28 Subject: QW-405.2, Welding Position (2004 Edition) Date Issued: June 21, 2006 File No...

Dear All As per Table QW.261 in column "Brief of Variables", QW.405.1, + Position is an "essential variable". If I understand. And I want to issue a WPS covering all positions 1S, 2S and 4S according to Figure QW.461.7, I have to qualify each position separately. Clearly, I should have 3 PQRs...

metengr Thanks alot for your reply. In fact, I realized that there was confusion in some passages. Please read. API RP 582 6.2 Dissimilar Welding 6.2.1 When joining dissimilar ferritic steels (P-1 though P-5), the filler metal shall conform to the nominal chemical composition of either...

Dear All I need your help for this matter. I have to weld A335-P11 (1-1/4 Cr - ½ Mo) to A106B (Carbone Steel). Construction Code ASME B31.3 (Process Piping) I have a qualified PQR Base Metal: A335-P11 to A335-P11 P4.1 as per ASME IX – QW-422 Process welding: SMAW Filler Metal: E8018-B2...

Hi everybody, Thanks alot for all your responses. Best Regards

Hi everybody! For our welding work on a project, we purchased the low hydrogen electrode E7018-1H4R Ø 3.2 mm. But the client rejected it because on the mill certificate appears just the results of chemical analysis. The reason of the rejection is that this electrode is not conform with the...