Upstream Fan Placement:
- Pros:
The fan handles cleaner, cooler gas, potentially prolonging its lifespan and reducing maintenance needs.
Pierreick,
Did you write this or is this a Google AI summary? This looks like AI garbage. If this is a re-post of a google search, like you alluded to, please refrain from posting such nonsense on these forums. It is clear that AI has a long way to go before being able to be relied upon for "sound engineering judgement", and this post is either actively incorrect on a few critical points, or is 100% confident on a point which actually may change based on the process.
Case-in-point from the quote above:
I don't see how placing a fan upstream of a scrubber protects the fan from dirty or corrosive gases, since those have yet to be scrubbed out by the wet scrubber. The only time I could see that a fan upstream would be exposed to a less corrosive environment (i.e. for acid gas streams) is if there is essentially no moisture content in the gas stream, meaning acid gases would not be corrosive, whereas downstream of a wet scrubber the un-scrubbed acids, mixed with humidification by the scrubber, may be corrosive. Gases upstream of a scrubber tend to be hotter (often from combustion processes), wet, and dirtier, as they have yet to be scrubbed/quenched by the wet scrubber.
"
Flexibility:
Downstream placement offers more flexibility in terms of system layout and access."
What does this even mean? Plant equipment layout and access doesn't care if the fan is upstream or downstream of the scrubber. You can have great, or poor, access in either configuration.