As EdStainless and SJones mentioned, sigma phase formation in duplex stainless steels should be evaluated. For quality control of duplex materials, we refer to ISO 17781 and A923. Note that this phase can lead to localized depletion of alloying elements, a phenomenon known as sensitization. To...
Of course, it depends on the application. However, if you're simply looking for a material grade to perform calculations for your homework, you can refer to ASTM specifications for bars. For example, A276-31803 is a common choice for shafts in duplex stainless steel classes. Some manufacturers...
I have not yet conducted such an evaluation. However, as outlined in the EPRI document "Embrittlement of Power Plant Steels" (publicly available on the EPRI website), you can estimate the FATT using predictive formulas based on the part’s chemical composition. Additionally, metallography and...
As a corrosion engineer, here are my points:
In HRSGs, three primary chemical treatments are used. Additionally, solid alkalizing agents like trisodium phosphate may be added to HRSG water to enhance impurity tolerance and mitigate corrosion risks:
AVT(R) (All-Volatile Treatment – Reducing)...
Even if we use SS316 in these conditions, crevice corrosion probably remains a concern. I would expect it to occur even in flowing seawater, depending on the crevice geometry.
Thank you for your valuable insights. It’s truly heartwarming to see experienced engineers in this forum dedicating their time to educate others.
I may have overlooked something in this discussion, so I’d appreciate some clarification. To my understanding, pitting corrosion is among the primary...
I have experience working with stainless steels in RO desalination plants, where I’ve observed severe pitting in cases where SS316 was exposed to seawater.
In RO desalination, chlorine (not chloride) is removed by dosing SMBS (sodium metabisulfite), a reducing agent. However, excessive SMBS can...
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I believe material selection depends on the specific application, and austenitic stainless steels are not universally prohibited. For instance, some boiler manufacturers use them for components like connecting baffles in applications up to 650°C...
Thank you for your helpful insights.
Here’s what I understand from your posts: In a reducing environment created by H₂S, significantly higher chloride concentrations are required for stress corrosion cracking (SCC) to occur. However, pitting or crevice corrosion can still develop at chloride...
Thank you for your insightful response. As you noted, EN 10269 provides high-temperature properties for fasteners, but it lacks mechanical property data for grades 1.4301, 1.4401, 1.4404, and 1.4304 at temperatures above 550–600°C, While, ASME Section II, Part D (Table 3) includes this data for...
Thank you for joining this discussion. To clarify my question: Why are austenitic stainless steels excluded from a standard intended to guide bolt selection for high-temperature applications?
Additionally, high-temperature decision-making requires extensive data, typically compiled by...
Hello,
Austenitic stainless steel bolts and nuts can be used in high-temperature applications, and their maximum temperature limit is quite high in the ASME Sec II Part D standard. For example, B8 grade (SS304) is allowed up to 816°C (though some technical limitations, like relaxation...
It is known that Austenitic stainless steels (SS304,SS316,…) are prone to SCC in chloride bearing environments. The chloride is normally controlled within a certain limit to prevent stress corrosion cracking. In some cases, such as hydrotest, standards normally suggest 50 ppm chloride...
Thank you for the insight. My remaining practical question: When PE/PP is exposed to sulfuric acid, how do we answer "When will it fail?" Based on the provided table and typical data for polymeric materials, there is no clearly defined failure timeline for these applications.