What does the applicable fabrication specification say, either directly, or by reference to another welding procedure qualification standard?
https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:15614:-1:ed-2:v2:en
1. Incorrect materials selection: 304 didn’t stand much of a chance
2. Cut and replace
3. Select a more appropriate grade - applies also to 2, and adopt tighter welding and hydrotest practices
Try a Google search on “Review of the effects of steel composition and heat treatment on Charpy energy toughness”, or try a variant prompt in your bot of choice. It’s not really a question of ‘expectation’ rather one of ‘verification’
@DekDee - the technique under discussion is tangential. The 115 mm comes from the formula in ISO 20769-1, i.e along the pipe wall, as opposed to straight through.
The penetrated thickness is around 115 mm. For Se75, ISO 20769-1 recommends a maximum penetrated thickness of 55 mm for a basic technique, and 40 mm for an enhanced technique. Digital techniques may extend the recommended penetrated thickness. As to whether such techniques could give the...
Their rules. Their problem if it doesn't work out.
I'm not really a downstream afficionado, but I would get Technical Safety involved as to their view on relying upon an operating procedure to create inherently safe conditions versus picking a material with resistance to the failure mode.
Is it not recommended to work on the max operating conditions.
Until the process safety system settings are finalised, the max operating conditions will be guesswork too. It will also depend on the risk tolerance of the assessment in terms of the expectation of how rapidly the damage mechanism...