Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Recent content by rccon

  1. rccon

    Lateral Bracing of Garage Wing Walls

    I fully agree that your anchor rods would have to go down to the footing, but don't see how you can resist 10 kips of lateral force with two 2' wide shear walls. This is 2500 plf of unit shear which is about twice what you can resist with a two-sided shear wall. The Simpson 2' x 10' shear wall...
  2. rccon

    Sill Plate Anchor Bolts

    chipb- I guess I'll add my two bits worth because this is a problem which has long bothered me. Most residential basements where I am (Seattle) don't get engineered, although at 11' of backfill, these days it may be required. Anyway, the reason they don't fail even though restraint at the top is...
  3. rccon

    Beam on elastic foundation

    Both chipb and mrstohler suggest that a lower value of the subgrade modulus ks produces a higher bearing pressure, but it seems to me it's just the opposite. A lower ks would permit greater deflection under a concentrated load, resulting in a lower bearing pressure but a higher moment in the...
  4. rccon

    Gambrel Roof Framing

    This sounds to me like a bad idea. Each rafter pair is unstable under lateral or unbalanced gravity forces. It needs a horizontal reaction at the ridge as well as at the plate to prevent collapse. It might be stable if the ridge beam is adequate for the horizontal load, or if the roof sheathing...
  5. rccon

    Rafter Cuts on Structural Ridge

    Pylko, I respectfully disagree. Notching the top of a rafter to bear on the ridge beam creates a wedge between the bearing surface and a short line of grain, which is vulnerable to splitting with loss of bearing. It is generally a poor practice. Notching the bottom creates no such problem, so...
  6. rccon

    lateral analysis of irregular shaped building

    You probably have a plan structural irregularity type 2, re-entrant corners (UBC table 16-M), and sec.1633.2.9 paragraph 7 would apply if you are is seismic zones 3 or 4. You need to tie the sections together because they will tend to move in different directions.
  7. rccon

    Folded plate plywood roof diaphragms

    For steep roofs, I analyze a frame consisting of a rafter pair and a stud, under the influence of the horizontal force. The reactions are four: horizontal and vertical at the bottom of the stud, and longitudinal in each rafter. The equations are four: H, V, & M =0 at the bottom of the stud and...
  8. rccon

    Jacked Reinforced Timber Joists

    If the problem is too much flexural stress or shear stress then, as whyun suggests, sister joists are your best bet. If the problem is too much deflection or vibration from a footfall, try this: put in a row of solid blocking at midspan, very tight. Then put a steel strap across the bottom of...

Part and Inventory Search