Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Recent content by brad

  1. brad

    More on solver speed: ROI of expensive commercial sw?

    Automotive N&V and full-vehicle crash guys still put a premium on performance, as their models are often on the order of 2-10 Million dofs (and often thousands of modes in the case of N&V). This is why at the automotive OEM's the niche players have almost no footprint--they can't scale to solve...
  2. brad

    Node mass in ABAQUS

    *ELEMENT, TYPE=MASS, ELSET= . .. *MASS, ELSET= . . . (for rotational, see *ROTARY INERTIA)
  3. brad

    Simple? Statics

    ivymike-- The basic assumption that people have started with is that this was an originally-level plate. Something must have caused this plate to become "out-of-level" upon the removal of cable 4. Some net moment must cause this to rotate, then must be reacted by an opposing moment to cause it...
  4. brad

    Simple? Statics

    Vonlueke: you state "In other words, the plate will rotate slightly and now be "crooked." But notice, even then, the force in cable 2 is still zero." This illustrates a fundamental error in this line of reasoning. If there is absolutely no force in cable 2, then what causes this rigid plate...
  5. brad

    Abaqus, ANSYS, Algor, Mechanica which is the best?

    Re: tying meshes... I know that ABAQUS has the facility to tie disparate meshes together. What it amounts to is a special form of contact, in which the "slave" surface's nodes are tied to the master (thus the displacements are locked to the interpolated displacement of the master surface). Thus...
  6. brad

    Simple? Statics

    JStephen, YOur post, though sarcastic, is correct. However, most of us can likely agree that many of those assumptions are second-order effects for most use-cases. (Note that if we were talking of an engine, I likely would've cited thermal expansion as a point of concern). Nobody who has taken...
  7. brad

    on rubber dynamic stiffness

    Tom, I find it curious that you would so quickly dismiss ABAQUS in this field. While there may be some argument as to which one is best in rubber modeling, most people in the field acknowledge that both of these analysis codes are exceptional for this type of work. (In fact many of the original...
  8. brad

    Simple? Statics

    Why the heck are we talking about cables? These are bolts, folks--each able to react 6 degrees of freedom. 6 dof x 4 bolts = 24 degrees of freedom to solve. Statics = 6 equations. How do you solve 24 unknowns with only 6 equations available? It's not statics! You can simplify all you want...
  9. brad

    Rectangular Square Tubing

    If you know the cross-sectional geometry, you can fairly easily calculate moments of inertia. Brad
  10. brad

    Simple? Statics

    I don't think there is enough information to definitely determine the answer--it is a statically indeterminate system (thus it's not "pure statics"). The answer is dependent on the stiffness of the piece to which the bolts are attached. If all bolts are attached to an effectively rigid piece...
  11. brad

    Rectangular Square Tubing

    Can't you just calculate MOI and use simply supported beam assumptions with a constant pressure load? (or am I missing something) Brad
  12. brad

    MOMENTS OF INERTIA

    If you have the MOI about the CG, it's not clear to me what else you need. You need to clarify your question.
  13. brad

    VERY large displacement - move coord. system

    Can you use inertia relief? This sounds like this would be an entirely appropriate assumption for your problem as described. (I don't know whether or not ANSYS has inertia relief, but if it does this would be ideal) Brad
  14. brad

    Geometric Imperfection

    What is the error message?

Part and Inventory Search