×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

The Packard torsion ride system

The Packard torsion ride system

The Packard torsion ride system

(OP)
Having recently purchased a 56 Packard with torsion bar supension I have a question for those who may know the answer. (I'm very impressed with the knowledge with most of the contributors to this and other forums within this group). For those who may not be familier with it, there is a single torsion bar for each side of the car that is connected to the front and rear wheels. When the vehicle is raised you can push up on the front wheel and the rear wheel goes down and vice versa. There is a second tosion bar at the rear wheels on each side to maintain ride height and control the see saw effect. A compensator motor controls the amount of twisting force that is in this second bar. By virtue of this ride height is maintained independant of the amount of weight carried when the vehicle is returned to level ride attitude via this compensator motor. According to the Packard manual the theory being that only have of the energy jounce of a bump to the front wheels goes into tha car and the rest is transmitted to the rear wheels with this system. I must say that even with very old bias ply tires this is the finest riding car I have ever driven. So the $64,000 question is howcome no other manufacturer(to my knowledge) has incorperated this system in thier product line? Are there any faults. Potential race car application advantage/ disadvantage? -------------Phil

RE: The Packard torsion ride system

The original Mini used linked fore aft suspensions, I think, at least in prototype form. The Lotus active ride cars also used cross linking between corners.

The obvious disadvantage is traction, on a rear wheel drive car. As the front wheel rides over a bump the trailing rear wheel will also unload. You could get round that by upping the rear sta bar... but that would degrade the ride.

Also the setup as described would tend to oversteer a lot, you'd need a front sta bar. Ideally you'd also have an anti-warp bar, then you'd have complete control over the springing.

The crash guys would probably hate it, but appropriate use of breakaway features could minimise the downside there.

Fundamentally are you not trading off good pitch control against roll? Modern cars tend to annoy people far more with roll (head toss) than they do with pitch.

Cheers

Greg Locock

RE: The Packard torsion ride system

Smokey,
As Greg mentioned the original Mini and larger 1100 / 1800 (4 door saloons)used the interlinked suspension system developed by Moulton in the UK and used by British Layland in the  Morris and Austin cars under the name "Hydolastic".
There was a later refinement using gas spheres called "Hydragas" but neither system provided for any form of self leveling.

The Citroen company in France used an interconnected system on the 2CV models and derivatives with one coil spring and  push/pull rods connected to the wheels on the same side.
The arms connecting the wheels to the chassis were cast steel and acted as the dampers for the car.
The market was the immediate post was ravaged agriculturally based France and the engine was 375 cc air cooled flat twin and a four speed manual gearbox with a centrifugal clutch
The ride is very smooth but no provision for self leveling was provided since Citroen had a fully self leveling hydraulic system in their larger cars from the mid 1950's.

Pete.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close