×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Composite section design - effective flange width

Composite section design - effective flange width

Composite section design - effective flange width

(OP)
Hello

I am trying to design a composite girder for a bridge using AASHTO.  I have a situation where I need to determine the effective flange width for the following situation:

The fascia girder of the bridge is the girder in question, which is supporting the beams under the turn lanes for a diamond type interchange, so the configuration kind of looks something like:
  
=============  Main girders

=============  Main girder (fascia)
------/
-----/ <-----Wing beam supporting wing stub beams (-)
----/


Anyway the fascia beam has a 1'-6" overhang of deck slab on the outside.  The other side is like a regular bridge deck.

What would you do if you wanted to determine the effective slab width for composite girder design?  All AASHTO considers is if the beam is an interior or exterior beam. and if it is exterior, it is considered that the deck slab ends at the end of the flange on one side and keeps going on the other side.  how do you consider that 1'6" overhang?

Thanks
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

RE: Composite section design - effective flange width

Reading AASHTO sometimes is like trying to read Nitchze.  Some design procedures allow you to use your overhang for strength.  However, if you have to design using AASHTO, and they say do not use the overhang (just to the edge of flange), then I would just use what AASHTO has put forth.

Also, if the 1'6 overhang is only on part of the girder, I dont think you would be allowed to use it.

RE: Composite section design - effective flange width

(OP)
pylko:Thanks for your reply.  The overhang is only on one side of the girder.  You are right about AASHTO, it is sometimes fuzzy about things, especially on this one.  It does not say anything about not using the overhang.  I guess they only assume two conditions:  a.The deck is continuous on both sides or b.The deck is continuous on one side and ends at the end of the girder flange on the other.  No provisions for an overhang type of situation was is considered.

RE: Composite section design - effective flange width

Yes, I think you're right about AASHTO and their 2 conditions.  What if you analyze the girder without the overhang to see if it works, and if you then come up short in what you need, include the overhang.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close