×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Tantalum Testing- standards

Tantalum Testing- standards

Tantalum Testing- standards

(OP)
I am having trouble obtaining reference materials containing tantalum with certified values.  I am working on setting-up calibration curves on an optical emission spectrometer to test PH 17-4 materials.  

Does anyone know where I could obtain CRM's with certified Ta values for this purpose?

RE: Tantalum Testing- standards

Here is the NIST website for metals.  I notice that Ta isn’t certified, but you can bet the numbers are vert, very close to accurate.   There is another source I think is the Swedish Institute of Metals.

https://srmors.nist.gov/BrowseMaterials.cfm?subkey=1&category=1

It has been my experience that your are lucky just to get repeatable analyses of 17/4.  Ta is bear to analyze in a stainless matrix.   We had a lot of components “Tantalated” and tried very hard do analytical work on the materials with very little success.

RE: Tantalum Testing- standards

Unclesyd's comment on the difficulty of tantalum detection in a stainless matrix is one of the reasons that Committee F of the SAE Aerospace Metals Division has removed tantalum from the composition list for 17-4, 15-5, and similar metals in the AMS series of specifications.  That, and the fact that since Ta is so much more expensive than Cb, the actual amount of Ta found in Cb ferroalloys is slight.

So check out AMS 5643 for 17-4 bar, for instance, and you'll see that Ta is no longer required to be analyzed.  If you buy to ASTM specifications, perhaps an e-mail to the proper committee would cause them to review the situation.

Good luck!

Lee

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close