I'm new here to mathcad and I'm trying to find the eigenvalues of a second order spring/mass system without damping. I have a 6 by 6 matrix and I would prefer not to solve it symbolically because the solution would be too long. Is there a command to solve this system, or do I need to refresh my diffeq skills.
Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
Second Order Eigenvalues
- Thread starter PhilipFry
- Start date
GregLocock
Automotive
Six by six? wow.
Oh well, assuming that's right as we all know the eigenvalues L are the solution to the equation
determinant(A-L.I)=0
You need to know the oh so cryptic command
L:=eigenvals(A)
Works for me!
Now I've got to figure out how a 2DOF system can have 6 frequencies...
Cheers
Greg Locock
Oh well, assuming that's right as we all know the eigenvalues L are the solution to the equation
determinant(A-L.I)=0
You need to know the oh so cryptic command
L:=eigenvals(A)
Works for me!
Now I've got to figure out how a 2DOF system can have 6 frequencies...
Cheers
Greg Locock
- Thread starter
- #3
Wait, I thought the eigenvals command was for a first order diffeq. In other words, I thought the system solved Cs+k=0, instead of ms^2+cs+kx=0. So, it seems to me like my answer using Mathcad would be in terms of s^2 instead of s. Am I off-base here?
As far as why I have a 6x6 matrix:
Simple, I do not have kinematic contraints holding me to y=0 or x=0. Also, I have a degree of freedom when it comes to rotation, so since I have two bodies, each with 3 DOF...
As far as why I have a 6x6 matrix:
Simple, I do not have kinematic contraints holding me to y=0 or x=0. Also, I have a degree of freedom when it comes to rotation, so since I have two bodies, each with 3 DOF...
GregLocock
Automotive
m.w^2.x+c.w.x+k.x=0
doesn't need s^2
Cheers
Greg Locock
doesn't need s^2
Cheers
Greg Locock
- Thread starter
- #5
Here is another way:
You have your matrix of masses: M
And your stiffness matrix: K (already condensated)
From the book: Dynamics of Structures, 2nd edition from Anil Chopra (if you have it good!), chapter 10.15 page 440.
You can solve it just like this:
As you can see the example is wrong because the first mode is the 3rd row of "omega" and 3rd column of "phi" (1st mode) is negative, but this is just an example, you get the idea.
You have your matrix of masses: M
And your stiffness matrix: K (already condensated)
From the book: Dynamics of Structures, 2nd edition from Anil Chopra (if you have it good!), chapter 10.15 page 440.
You can solve it just like this:
As you can see the example is wrong because the first mode is the 3rd row of "omega" and 3rd column of "phi" (1st mode) is negative, but this is just an example, you get the idea.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Question