AWS B2.1 vs. D9.1
AWS B2.1 vs. D9.1
(OP)
Would there be an advantage to qualifying welding procedures and welder performance using D9.1 vs. B2.1? The application is GTAW & GMAW, nickel-alloy plate and sheet, down to 11 gauge. Is procedure qualification easier with D9.1 (maybe bend tests only, vs. RT or tensiles using B2.1)?
Thanks in advance.
Thanks in advance.
RE: AWS B2.1 vs. D9.1
It was a lot easier calling out "next" than trying to cutout or repair to a nickel based weld.