×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

duplex ASME VIII div. 2
2

duplex ASME VIII div. 2

duplex ASME VIII div. 2

(OP)
Does anybody know why duplex stainless steels aren't allowed/mentioned in ASME VIII div. 2?  Is there a specific technical reason for or hasn't anybody had the need for that?
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

RE: duplex ASME VIII div. 2

Do you Mean RE: 2205 Duplex SS (S31803), (UNS S31803)

RE: duplex ASME VIII div. 2

(OP)
Isthill,

UNS31803 among all the others; in table AHA-1 there is not one duplex stainless steel mentioned.  Only austenitic and some martensitic and ferritic stainless steels.

RE: duplex ASME VIII div. 2

2
The duplex stainless steels are limited as to their service temperature range because they can form sigma phase or other intermetallic phases that can significantly reduce toughness.

The approximate useful service temperature range I have seen published for duplex stainless steels are -50 deg C to 280 deg C. If I had to guess, this is probably the reason for not endorsing these materials in Div 2 applications.

RE: duplex ASME VIII div. 2

(OP)
metengr,

I know the limitations of duplex SS: low temperature toughness and possible embrittlement at long exposure time to temperatures around and above 475°C.  But is this a reason not to incorporate this into ASME VIII div. 2?  In Div. 1 f.e. the use of UNS 31803 is also limited to 600°F.

RE: duplex ASME VIII div. 2

marc1000;
My reasoning for limiting the duplex ss is based on the statements in AG-100 (Scope) particularly paragraph e. Div 2 deals with vessel design related to high pressures and it may well be that a more conservative approach is being used to restrict materials, in comparison to Div 1 rules.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close