Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Finite Difference Optical Waveguide Mode Solver

Finite Difference Optical Waveguide Mode Solver

Finite Difference Optical Waveguide Mode Solver

When solving the eigenvalue problem [A]*E =(beta^2/k0^2)*E, where beta is the prop constant, E the electric field and k0 the free space wavenumber:
Is there a limit on how small a discretisation step size you can take?

In my matrix [A] the main diagonal for a 2-D mesh is constructed by the expression:

n(x,y)^2 - 2/(xstep^2*k0^2) - 2/(ystep^2*k0^2)

Obviously when xstep or ystep and reduced to a small enough size this expresion produces a negative result, which gives purely imaginary eigenvalues which are incorrect. Does anyone know have I discretized the mesh incorrectly? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks K.J

RE: Finite Difference Optical Waveguide Mode Solver

All I know is that one time I did a sim based on cc chen's narrow slits and plane waves, the number of points was a critical parameter that was not clear in the paper., Plus it was an waste of time as in varying the geometric parameters of the problem, was, pure and simple random "colored" noise. sorry, I can not help, other than your sampling issue is not a trivial one. good luck, hope someone with some brains will step up to the plate.

RE: Finite Difference Optical Waveguide Mode Solver

Thanks GOTWW,

As it turned out my discretisation was fine, it was how I was getting the eigenvalues. I was looking for the 3 eigenvalues that were largest in magnitude. This was fine when the main diagonal was positive but when xstep was reduced further it went negative, the eigenvalues I was after were no longer lagest in magnitude, the negative ones were. It was one of those cases where you leave something for a while and come back to it the problem reveals itself.

All the best!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close