×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Microphonics

Microphonics

Microphonics

(OP)
Microphonics

Hi all, I would appreciate any help in understanding testing for microphonics.

    We have following requirements on Oven Controlled Crystal Oscillator (OCXO) when subjected to the random vibration level of 0.01 G^2/Hz from 20 to 200 Hz and the sinusoidal level of 0.1 G peak to peak from 20 to 120 Hz.

1.    overall frequency stability < +/- 3.5 ppm
2.    short term frequency stability of 3 sigma limit allen variance measured over a  minimum of 150 samples with the sample of 100 milliseconds or less.  The unit shall not vary more than +/-  1E-7 per second
3.    frequency pulling shall be the frequency variation measured with a load of a voltage standing wave radio (VSWR) as high as 2.0:1 and shall not exceed +/-0.02ppm.

I am a mechanical engineer and trying to understand the microphonics.  Can anyone tell me the implications of carrying out the sinusoidal test (the sinusoidal level of 0.1 G peak to peak from 20 to 120 Hz.) at fixed frequency of 20, 40 and 60 Hz instead of continuous sine sweep from 20 to 120 Hz?

Thanks in advance.

RE: Microphonics

I can see two issues involved with a vibration test on an oscillator:
A) Changes that result in frequency drift - i.e. more of a after-the-test frequency shift. This is addressed by your requirement #1.
B) Phase noise of the oscillator as it is exposed to the vibration - more of a modulation of the output signal - usually referred to as microphonics. This seems to be what is addressed in your requirement #2.

The issues doing the vibration at several fixed frequencies Vs a sweep are the same issues you would encounter in a vibration test where you are looking for mechanical resonances. In this case, vibration of a particular component or flexure modes of the device may only occur at particular vibration frequencies, which a fixed frequency vibration test may fail to excite. It is changes in the capacitance/inductance/resistance or piezoelectric effect of components under vibration that cause microphonics, and the vibration is at it's maximum when you sweep across the mechanical resonance of a part.

Also see this previous thread on microphonics:
Thread247-78820

RE: Microphonics

(OP)
Comcokid,

        Thank you very much.  The random vibration test did show some resonances in the frequency range.  However, electrical performance (phase noise from 100Hz to 1 MHz and Single - Sideband AM noise) showed performance within specifications.  Since the vendor carried out the sine vibration test at particular frequency only (at resonance) I was wondering whether we were overlooking any other aspect of the electrical functional test.

        The reason for carrying out the sine vibration this way as stated by vendor "was being generating too much of data at other frequencies".  This may be true or they may not have proper instrumentation.

         I think we can accept the vendor's test as long as the sine vibration is carried out at resonance frequencies.
Thank you very much for the help.

Regards.

RE: Microphonics

I would think that the requirement should tested exactly the same as it would for a resonance search.  

You would therefore sweep the entire frequency range of 20 to 120 with sufficient dwell at each frequency to determine if there are any problems.  A subset is a subset, so you run the risk of not detecting a problem.

If there are anomalies, you would treat them like you would resonance peaks and would then perform an endurance dwell to see what the problem is and to see if anything breaks.

TTFN

RE: Microphonics

(OP)
IRStuff,

        Point well taken.  This is on similar lines that we run pre and post random vibration sine sweeps to detect any failures during radom vibration test.

        In your opinion what would be the acceptable sweep rate for sine sweep particularly for microphonics considering vendor's view of "too much data"?.  I want this test being run properly without compromising the test objectives.  At the same time I do not want to go overboard.
I have noticed that our specification does not state the sweep rate for the sine vibration.

Thanks,

RE: Microphonics

Depends on what you're trying to accomplish with this test.  If it's a design verification test, then you'd need to dwell long enough to find out if there are any problems at each frequency.  That could be seconds, minutes...

On the other hand, if this is part of acceptance testing, then sampling may be the way to go, particularly if, based on the first article design verification testing, you've identified specific frequencies that may give you problems.

For military systems, we generally perform sine sweep only during design verification and we use temp-vibe ESS to do product integrity testing as part of acceptance.

TTFN

RE: Microphonics

(OP)
IRStuff,

        Thanks,

        Our "Quality Conformance and Qualification Cross-Reference Matrix", show that requirement for microphonics verification for qualification as well as acceptance is by test.

         Since this is the first test on this OCXO, we will have to do the full sine sweep from 20 to 120 Hz as suggested by you.

         Thank you very much for the help.
Regards,

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close