×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

*
*
*
*

Thanks. We have received your request and will respond promptly.

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Pipe versus Open Channel

thread162-88681

Pipe versus Open Channel

Pipe versus Open Channel

(OP)
I need help trying to explain to lay people that a much larger open channel ditch that may hold water, mosiquito breeding ground, have weeds, bank erosion (i.e. maintenance headache) that outfalls into a canal, that has a water surface elevation sometimes 3 feet higher than the invert of the ditch, is compared to a smaller smooth closed pipe that has a consistent slope.

The idea of the greater difference in surface area between the two confuses people to think that the ditch can handle more flow.

Bare in mind, I am working for a developer of a property adjacent to an existing subdivision that drains into the ditches that we will be inclosing. (Don't develop in my backyard syndrome)

Another thing to bare in mind is dentention is not an option. I live in New Orleans. We are below Sea Level. We pump water out not hold it in.

Any ideas on visual presentations that can convince the existing residents that a closed system will be better for them.

Thanks...in advance.

Matt

RE: Pipe versus Open Channel

I think the layperson can understand the concept of resistance to flow behind Manning's "n" values.  No need to numb them with Hydraulic Radius and so forth.  I think I would just photocopy a one page table with many Manning's "n" values from an authoritative source that people recognize (the Army Corp would be good, your own state's DEP or DOT would probably be better).  Then explain why smooth -lined pipe is around 0.012 and grass ranges from 0.3 to 0.2 (again leave out the d/D theory and such).

It sounds like you are more worried that the adjoiners are actually opposed to the development more than enclosing the ditch (why should they oppose closing a ditch, it will look better?).  If this is the case, don't waste too much time on it...just dutifully put together a presentation for your meeting, and present it as politely and professionally as you can.  They are likely to use any stall tactic they can find (IF they are opposed to development).

RE: Pipe versus Open Channel

If all things were equal, I'd rather enclose a ditch that adjoined my property.  But sometimes there are other things to consider:

On one hand, it IS possible for a pipe with a smaller cross sectional area may be able to convey as much or more than a larger open ditch.

On the other hand, the surface area is not necessarily a point of confusion. In the scenario described, the additional "storage" in the ditch may attenuate flows in a beneficial way.  Piping could cause downstream flooding.

Also, the open ditch could provide a "water quality" component that the piped system would not.

RE: Pipe versus Open Channel

Lets all remember that now-a-days everything leans towards aesthetics.  So under-grounding a conveyance system may have benefits other than cost and such.  So one approach would be adressing the "Looks" of the system and the ability to use the area above the Pipe.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login

Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now
Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close