×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
• Talk With Other Members
• Be Notified Of Responses
• Keyword Search
Favorite Forums
• Automated Signatures
• Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

#### Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

# NPSHA vs NPSHR

## NPSHA vs NPSHR

(OP)
I am calculating NPSHA for specifying a 4,000 gpm gasoline pump.

I know manufacturer's pump curve prepare NPSHR curve based upon water. Therefore, I assume NPSHA conponents should all be referenced using water.  Is this correct?

For example I am proposing that NPSHA would be 33' water (atmospheric head from an vented storage tank, less 17' water (vp of 7.5 psia gasoline converted to water, plus 3' water static suction head less 4' water friction head (suction losses based upon gasoline then converted to water.

### RE: NPSHA vs NPSHR

In calculating NPSHA you should refer to gasoline applying correction factor, if any, on NPSHR with water.

### RE: NPSHA vs NPSHR

There is no "correction factor" as such - just remember that NPSHa includes that you subtract the vapour pressure of the medium. This can often be ignored for water unless the temperature is high.

You dont need to refer to "water". Calculated the NPSH a as your static head (incl ambient pressure) (inch, feet, meter whatever) - pressure loss in piping - vapour pressure and stick to "absolute pressure" even though this may stress some mechanical engineers.

Best regards

Morten

### RE: NPSHA vs NPSHR

Dear Morten,
May be I was not clear. The correction factor to apply is on the NPSHR not NPSHA. In case of gasoline, I think that no correction is needed.

### RE: NPSHA vs NPSHR

(OP)
Maybe I was not clear in my question.  Should atmospheric pressure be 33 feet of water or 33ft divided by SG of gasoline?

### RE: NPSHA vs NPSHR

You have two ways: to make calculation referring to feet or to psi. If you chose psi then you have to convert to feet. Anyway, your assumption to divide atmospheric pressure in feet by S.G. is correct.

### RE: NPSHA vs NPSHR

OK if you move into specifying the pressure in psi/bar whatever then of course you need to calculate the pressure using the actual media (and thus include teh actual gravity of gasoline). If you however specify your liquid and the NPSH in liquid collumn - then you are beyound that.

Best regards

Morten

#### Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

#### Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

#### Resources

Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now
The Great Project Profitability Debate
A/E firms have a great opportunity to lead the world into the future, but the industryâ€™s greatest assetâ€”real-time dataâ€”is sitting wasted in clunky, archaic ERP platforms. Learn how real-time, fully interactive dashboards in a modern ERP allow you to unlock data that will shape the future of the world. Download Now

Close Box

# Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

• Talk To Other Members
• Notification Of Responses To Questions
• Favorite Forums One Click Access
• Keyword Search Of All Posts, And More...

Register now while it's still free!