×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Per vs Because of

Per vs Because of

Per vs Because of

(OP)
I always hear engineers start their aruguments to a question with "Per the bad test data results, we'll have to run it again."

Although "per" is a preposition, it is often misused because the term is shorter than because of.

By Webster's definition, because of means "on account of" while per means "by the agency of; for, to, or by each; according to."

You wouldn't say "Per the rainy weather, we had to cancel our picnic."  But, you would still say, "Per our phone conversation,..."

I can't tell you how many times I've been corrected on this, and I find myself correcting others now.  Basically, if you can say "On account of..." in place of per, then use because of.

--Scott

For some pleasure reading, try FAQ731-376

RE: Per vs Because of

Scott,

I hate that as well. I see it all the time on prints and specifications as "detail per specification so-and-so". Drives me nuts. How about "In accordance with" or the TLA IAW.

Best regards,

Matthew Ian Loew
"Luck is the residue of design."
Branch Rickey


Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

RE: Per vs Because of

       Altough I'm Italian and I work and live in Italy, I often speak and, more often, write in English (specifications, test procedures and reports, and so on...).  
       We Italians are always tempted to overuse the word "per", as in Italian it has a more general meaning than in English: it can be said that it is the same of "for" in English (and so that's a sort of "false friend"...).

       It can be observed that, originally, in Latin "per" was used to express (both in literal and figurative senses) motion across, through somewhere or something, it meant something like "through".


       When writing in English, I usually utilize "per" in two meanings only:

              -     as a synonimous of "in accordance with",  "according to" as mentioned above [because it's shorter and... I tend to mix up  "with" and  "to" !], but always togheter with  "as" :  e.g.  "As per the relevant standard..." ,  "As per the above para. 3.1..." ;

        -    in the units of measure and to express a distribution as a synonimous of "every",  "each": e.g. "Miles per Hour..." ,  "1 ml/min per inch of valve diameter..." .     


Bye to all,            'NGL
        

RE: Per vs Because of

MLoew - It sounds like you are in a minority objecting to the useage "detail per specification so-and-so"

I use it all the time. I could say "in accordance with", but if "per" get's the job done, I like it better for the sake of brevity.

=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.

RE: Per vs Because of

from Merriam-Webster for per:

1 : by the means or agency of : THROUGH <per bearer>
2 : with respect to every member of a specified group : for each
3 : according to -- often used with as <per instructions> <as per usual>

So definition 3 is in accordance with common usage

TTFN

RE: Per vs Because of

(OP)
I think I have may have been mistaken when I started this thread.

Funny how I heard it to remind of the misuse.

The actual comparison that I want to compare is "due to" vs "because of."  Rarely should one start a sentence with "Due to..." but it happens all the time.  Happens so often that I forget when it is not appropriate and confuse it with something else.

--Scott

For some pleasure reading, try FAQ731-376

RE: Per vs Because of

swertel,

We had a report writing class WAY back when (is it ok to talk this way here??) where the professor said, "don't due it" I mean, "don't do it" i.e. don't start a sentence by saying (writing actually) "Due to" rather say, "As a result of"  I suppose "as a result of" does roll of the tongue a little cleaner or just sounds a little more professional.

Does 40 years hence qualify for way back when?

Jesus is THE life,
Leonard

RE: Per vs Because of

"Due to" doesn't bug me, it is obvious what is meant. To be honest I don't really object to "Because of X and Y we decided to do Z"

Sure it breaks a rule, but it sounds natural. I think the speaker is trying to emphasise the problems they had, rather than the intended course of action.

Cheers

Greg Locock

RE: Per vs Because of

(OP)
I don't know metman, you'll have to check with Mr. Peabody on that one.  Assuming you recognize that reference from "way back when."

--Scott

For some pleasure reading, try FAQ731-376

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close