Front Hub Load Input and Modeling

• Feb 11, 2004

• #2

JakubMech

Mechanical

Dec 11, 2003

39

AU

Hi,

on a few designs ive done ive used 4g from a bump during cornering.

Also dont forget about brake loads, and also to a lesser extend acceleration.

Jakub

 

Upvote 0 Downvote

• Feb 11, 2004

• Thread starter
• #3

Joest

Mechanical

Jan 16, 2003

99

US

Jakub,
Thanks, that's a good start. I've seen 3-5g quoted elswhere. How about lateral loading? As you probably know, the moment load on the bearing caused by a lateral force at the tire contact patch is the largest hurdle. Assuming full weight transfer of a heavy car (> 3000lb), a 275/40/17 tire, and 1g cornering, the lateral force can be as much as 1300-1500lbf, hence moment = rolling radius X lateral force = 12.5" x 1500lbf = 18750 in-lbf. I'm curious to know if this can spike higher such as when a driver curbs the outside tire on a berms such as that typically used on circuits to keep cars off the edges of the pavement.

Cheers,

-Joest

 

Upvote 0 Downvote

• Feb 11, 2004

• #4

funnelguy

Industrial

May 17, 2003

205

US

I suspect most of the loading from clouting kerbs is vertical loading. Kerb profile, vehicle weight, wheel rate and shock damping will determine the real numbers. Sorry, I don't have any for you. There is a data analysis thread on a forum I lurk at and I've never seen the issue discussed. A very good driver I worked with used to "straighten" or berm his 1300# sports racer on the exit curbing of the last turn at Watkins Glen. Typically resulted in a .2 or .3g spike in the lateral g's. More than that resulted in the car climbing the curb with the real possibility of high centering on the curb. Same course, I watched drivers bounce their cars over the curbs in the "Bus Stop" chicane. Sorry, we never measured vertical g's and I can't recall anything noteworthy about lateral g's through the chicane. I'd be very interested to see data from a trip into a gravel trap at speed! Good luck! I hope others will share some of their data...

 

Upvote 0 Downvote

• Feb 11, 2004

• Thread starter
• #5

Joest

Mechanical

Jan 16, 2003

99

US

Funnelguy,
Thanks for sharing some of your experiences. They are useful. I'm pretty sure that the load is kept within reason since the tire sidewall has give to it. I wouldn't expect it to be more than 0.5g increase lateral. We discuss many topics here on Eng-Tips, but often it is difficult to get specifics on the subtleties of suspension metrology data.

-Joest

 

Upvote 0 Downvote

• Feb 11, 2004

• #6

patprimmer

New member

Nov 1, 2002

13,816

US

I have no data, but in theory I agree with funnelguy.

If you mount the inside kerb, the wheel is already partly unloaded, so the loading in any but vertical planes is irrelevant.

If you ride up the outside kerb while sliding towards, the wheel alredy is loaded, and the maximum side and vertical loads that can be applied on a smooth surface will already be there. The extra traction obtained by both the vertical acceleration of the wheel, and the raising of that corner of the car relative to the other side, will have a substantial effect on both vertical and lateral loads

eng-tips, by professional engineers for professional engineers

Regards
pat

Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

 

Upvote 0 Downvote

• Feb 11, 2004

• #7

JakubMech

Mechanical

Dec 11, 2003

39

AU

As far as lateral and longatudinal effects, I have this if its any help:

for a kerb strike, 4g lateral.
for a bump or pothole, 3g longatudinal at effected wheel and 4g vertical.

These are more for consumer cars, not race cars, but it may give an idea. There was a post on here recently discussing suspension design and loadings for testing and how long it would last under those loadings, might try a search for that. It was along the lines of 3,2,1 which i assume is 3g bump, 2g corner, 1g longitudinal (although i would put more longitudinal), again production cars not race.

Jakub

 

Upvote 0 Downvote

• Feb 27, 2004

• #8

GregLocock

Automotive

Apr 10, 2001

23,895

Orbiting a small yellow star

2g was longitudinal, I think, 1g was lateral. Sideswiping a kerb could produce higher figures laterally, depending on the details of the event, but without revealing too much, most cars hop up over the kerb rather than slamming into it.

I picked up 3-2-1 for designing suspensions from two people who have designed a lot of suspensions- both for road and race cars. I suspect this means it is actually a bit excessive for race cars.

The peak loads for kerb strike, sqaure edge pot-hole and chuck hole events are also very event specific - hitting a 5 inch kerb square on will typically rip the suspension off after four goes, whereas a 2 inch step will be hit several hundred times during a standard durability test, with no significant effect.

I'd happily use 3-2-1 for bearing loads, but might want to get a bit cleverer if trying to optimise aluminium arms and things like that.

Cheers

Greg Locock

 

Upvote 0 Downvote