Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

finite conjugates cassegrain design

finite conjugates cassegrain design

finite conjugates cassegrain design

I have to design a Cassegrain optical device for finite conjugates (obj height <0.125mm). The object minimum-maximum distances required from the primary mirror are: 13-16 cm.
Does anybody know the best radium-to-radium ratio and primary mirror radium-to-mirror spacing for best performance in terms of light collection, when a paraxial magnification of (-1) is required?
Any hints for interesting related sites?
I'm a novel Zemax-EE user.

Thanks in advance

RE: finite conjugates cassegrain design

Magnification of -1? I would think that you would be better off to use a symmetrical system. Are you constrained to reflective optics?


RE: finite conjugates cassegrain design

Yes, I'm constrained to reflective optics. What's the best design for this kinda system?
I outline that the obj-to-secondary mirror distance must be between 13 to 18 cm and that the obj height is no more than 0.125 mm. The image must be collected on an N.A.=0.22 optical fiber.

What do u suggest me to do?

Thans in advance

RE: finite conjugates cassegrain design

I don't know what your wavelength is, much other important information. I think your best system would be symmetric. In your case, imagine a "Z" shaped optical system. Your object and source are at the ends of the "Z", and there are two spherical mirrors at the bends in the "Z". The beam is collimated between the two mirrors. If you need more beam control, use a pair of off-axis parabolas. I don't know your object NA, but I assume it is not too large. You could probably use focal length F~= 100 mm and easily find off-the-shelf optics.


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close