×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

ASTM A193 vs A449

ASTM A193 vs A449

ASTM A193 vs A449

(OP)
I need a little help.  I'm looking at using a threaded rod in pure tension.  The application calls for a 7/8" diameter by 10" rod in which A36 material is insufficient.  According to the AISC manual, the only materials readily available in round stock are A36, A572, A588(?) and A449 (I don't have the book in front of me, so bear with me if I left out one or two).  A449 is the only material sufficient in strength for my case.

I have met resistance from our suppliers with this spec.  They are saying we should use A193 Gr 7.  This resistance baffles me and brings me to the following questions:

1)  Why is A193 Gr7 not listed as an allowable material for threaded rod applications in the steel manual?  According to ASTM, the strengths are acceptable.  So do I ignore the allowable materials listed by AISC?

2)  Why are our fastener suppliers giving resistance for an A449 threaded rod?  I know these are commonly used for anchor bolts which require a high strength.  

If anyone could help point me in the right direction, I would appreciate it.

RE: ASTM A193 vs A449

The following is from a March 1999 Modern Steel Construction article by Charlie Carter titled "Are You Properly Specifying Materials?":

"The usual material specification for threaded rods... is ASTM A36.  Other material specifications that can be specified include ASTM A193, A307, A354, A449, A572, A588, and A687."

You can download the entire article from AISC's web site.

RE: ASTM A193 vs A449

(OP)
Thanks for the article.  It was just what I needed.  I was also able to get hold of a LRFD connections manual which listed A193.  For some reason, It was not listed in the ASD manual or maybe I couldn't find it.

Again Thanks

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

eBook - Rethink Your PLM
A lot has changed since the 90s. You don't surf the Web using dial-up anymore, so why are you still using a legacy PLM solution that's blocking your ability to innovate? To develop and launch products today, you need a flexible, cloud-based PLM, not a solution that's stuck in the past. Download Now
White Paper - Using Virtualization for IVI and AUTOSAR Consolidation on an ECU
Current approaches used to tackle the complexities of a vehicle’s electrical and electronics (E/E) architecture are both cost prohibitive and lacking in performance. Utilizing virtualization in automotive software architecture provides a better approach. This can be achieved by encapsulating different heterogeneous automotive platforms inside virtual machines running on the same hardware. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close