×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Professional Obligation

Professional Obligation

Professional Obligation

(OP)
What professional obligation do I have when I have noticed that a structure was not designed for drifted snow? I have called the design engineer and he agrees and has looked at the situation.

I have done some calcs and believe the metal roof deck is 30% overstressed with a 3 span cont. condition. The joist nearest the wall is about 20 % overstressed. This includes a revaluation of all existing dead loads since they were originally overestimated.

The design engineer says that he looked at it and he thinks he can justify saying that it is OK.

Do I leave it here, since this is his responsibility, or do I talk to him again and try to convince him that it is more overstressed than he thinks?

Do I have any obligation to inform the Owner or local building department?

RE: Professional Obligation

What you are really doing is questioning the competence of a fellow engineer.

Here in Manitoba our local association’s rules are clear on this. The correct forum is to inform the Investigations Committee of the association and allow them to investigate the issue. If necessary they can and will inform the appropriate authorities and the owner.

A full complaint would include your calculations and other observations.

You may of course have one final discussion with the designer in an effort to get him to take some action.

At the end of the day, your first professional obligation is to protect the public.


Rick Kitson MBA P.Eng

Construction Project Management
From conception to completion
www.kitsonengineering.com

RE: Professional Obligation

Your obligation is to protect the public welfare first and foremost.

That said, check with your state's engineering laws and code of conduct.  If you are not a PE, then find another PE to review them for guidance.  Some states in the US require an engineer to notify the owner direct if they know or are aware of a potential conflict.

In any case, document whatever you do and say.

The decking being overstressed wouldn't bother me all that much as it would still tend to react as a tension element between joists (like a cantenary curve).

The joists being 20% overstressed means that they will not fall down in a code snow load, but the required safety factor is not present.  Therefore, if perchance a larger than code snow load would occur, you might have joists going plastic on you and failure is a potential.

Probably, as the snow built up, the joists would excessively sag, giving some warning that there is a problem.  I've seen a couple of buildings where this has occurred - lots of distress in the hung acoustical ceiling but no failure - even with 8 foot of snow - way over the design.  How the joists managed to stay intact was beyond me.

Was the 20% overstress in flexure or shear?  Again, flexure offers the potential warning while shear might involve a diagonal weld connection failing.

RE: Professional Obligation

jike,

There is problem in here as your description seems to suggest the investigation is personal, incidental and you have no formal obligation to check the design calculation.

The building has not failed or showed any sign of distress.  Nevertheless as an experienced engineer you believe some structural members may have been undersized.  You therefore brought this to the designer's attention.

The designer verbally confirmed to you that in his opinion his design could be justified.

The only real leverage you have is to challenge the relevant design code has not been complied with.  If you feel strongly about it you can seek clarification (say ask to see the design calculation to compare with your assessment) from the designer, before bring the matter to the authority.  From the description of others there is a possibility of a reduction in the safety factors but there is no imminent risk of a collapse.  Thus it may be premature to disturb the owner because the designer may be willing to do something about it.

If the designer fails to convince you then you have an obligation to alert to the authority formally by pointing out the design deficiency.  If you feel the property can suffer distortion, damage or risk to its occupants then you have a moral duty as well as professional obligation to let the owner aware of your view.

I think the designer has a right to demonstrate to you that his design could be satisfactory, say by bringing in considerations additional to a standard design like different methods of analysis and 3D effects etc.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - Strategies to Secure Connected Cars with Firewalls
White-hat hackers have demonstrated gaining remote access to dashboard functions and transmissions of connected vehicles. That makes a firewall a vital component of a multilayered approach to vehicle security as well as overall vehicle safety and reliability. Learn strategies to secure with firewalls. Download Now
White Paper - Model Based Engineering for Wire Harness Manufacturing
As complexity rises, current harness manufacturing methods are struggling to keep pace due to manual data exchanges and the inability to capture tribal knowledge. A model-based wire harness manufacturing engineering flow automates data exchange and captures tribal knowledge through design rules to help harness manufacturers improve harness quality and boost efficiency. Download Now
White Paper - What is Generative Design and Why Do You Need It?
Engineers are being asked to produce more sophisticated designs under a perfect storm of complexity, cost, and change management pressures. Generative design empowers automotive design teams to navigate this storm by employing automation, data re-use and synchronization, and framing design in the context of a full vehicle platform. Download Now
eBook - Simulation-Driven Design with SOLIDWORKS
Simulation-driven design can reduce the time and cost of product development. In this engineering.com eBook, we’ll explore how SOLIDWORKS users can access simulation-driven design through the SOLIDWORKS Simulation suite of analysis tools. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close