×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

AASHTO LRFD Metric Equation 5.8.3.4.2-4

AASHTO LRFD Metric Equation 5.8.3.4.2-4

AASHTO LRFD Metric Equation 5.8.3.4.2-4

(OP)
I have a question regarding the metric version of the 1998 AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications.  Equation 5.8.3.4.2-4 shows Sxe=Sx*1.38/(Ag+0.63)<=2000 mm where Ag, Sx, and Sxe are all given in millimeters.  The English Units equation is Sxe=Sx*1.38/(Ag+0.63)<=80 where Ag, Sx, and Sxe are all given in inches.  I have been developing a spread sheet that will use these equations in calculating sheer in both English and SI units.  So far everything converts correctly, but this SI equation causes the Sxe value to drop dramatically when Ag is entered in SI units when compared with the English unit value.  In my opinion, the 1.38 and 0.63 numbers should be unit specific and not the same regardless of what unit system one is using.  I have not been able to find any errata regardgin this and was wondering if anyone has come across this problem and if so, what they have done to account for this.  

An example, if the above is not clear, is I have a Sx value in english units of 10.54in.  When the same model is done in equivalent SI units, I get an SI of 265.94mm, which is expected using a rough 25.4mm per in.  Using Ag=1.5in, Sxe is then calculated as 6.83in in English units.  In SI units, however, using Ag=40mm (the SI equivalent to 1.5in), an Sxe of 9.03 is calculated, instead of something closer to 173mm.  This causes problems mainly when using Table 5.8.3.4.2-2 and seems to cause the sheer capacity to be less conservative.

If anyone has any insight, I'd appreciate it.  Thanks.

RE: AASHTO LRFD Metric Equation 5.8.3.4.2-4

Hi BRDGBLR!
Thanks a lot for this post.

Actualy you are right.

We need to send a info to AASHTO, as even my version (2003-SI) has this mistake writen inside.(page is marked as changed in year 2000)(my page is 5-65.1).

The coeficients should be 1.38*25,4=35.052 and 0.63*25.4=16.002 and the result in SI units will be exactly 173mm.
Thanks again

ZMEI

RE: AASHTO LRFD Metric Equation 5.8.3.4.2-4

(OP)
Thanks for your response Zliazmei.  That's my assumption a well.  I have contacted AASHTO about this, but they have not respnded to my email yet.  If I here anything from them, I'll be sure to post it here.

RE: AASHTO LRFD Metric Equation 5.8.3.4.2-4

Hi bridgebuilder.

Did you recieve any responce from AASHTO?.

Zmei

RE: AASHTO LRFD Metric Equation 5.8.3.4.2-4

FYI

AASHTO has corrected this error in the 2003 interm.

Sxe=sx*(35/(ag+16))<=2000mm   eq (5.8.3.4.2-4)

Sx,Sxe & ag in mm

Asside,

Does anyone know what the proper equation for (5.11.4.2-2)for calculating the alternative development length (page 5-147 2001 interim).  This equation as written in the 2001 interim seems to be incorrect as it does not correlate to eq 5.11.4.2-1.  Is there another conversion issue with this formula?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - Strategies to Secure Connected Cars with Firewalls
White-hat hackers have demonstrated gaining remote access to dashboard functions and transmissions of connected vehicles. That makes a firewall a vital component of a multilayered approach to vehicle security as well as overall vehicle safety and reliability. Learn strategies to secure with firewalls. Download Now
White Paper - Model Based Engineering for Wire Harness Manufacturing
As complexity rises, current harness manufacturing methods are struggling to keep pace due to manual data exchanges and the inability to capture tribal knowledge. A model-based wire harness manufacturing engineering flow automates data exchange and captures tribal knowledge through design rules to help harness manufacturers improve harness quality and boost efficiency. Download Now
White Paper - What is Generative Design and Why Do You Need It?
Engineers are being asked to produce more sophisticated designs under a perfect storm of complexity, cost, and change management pressures. Generative design empowers automotive design teams to navigate this storm by employing automation, data re-use and synchronization, and framing design in the context of a full vehicle platform. Download Now
eBook - Simulation-Driven Design with SOLIDWORKS
Simulation-driven design can reduce the time and cost of product development. In this engineering.com eBook, we’ll explore how SOLIDWORKS users can access simulation-driven design through the SOLIDWORKS Simulation suite of analysis tools. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close