Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
Rainfall Intensity Curves 1
- Thread starter fuz
- Start date
-
1
- #2
You can construct them yourself for any location from the TP-40 (or whatever the later version is named) precip/freq/duration maps. For each frequency, note the series of precip amounts for each duration. Divide precip by duration to obtain the series of maximum average intensities for each frequency. Plot and connect the dots for each freq curve.
Yes, there are generalized equations which will closely approximate the same result, but they require that you solve for a series of coefficients by a iterative routine that's probably not worth your time to set up for a single case. Due to some work I've done in the past, I'm set up for it and will gladly kick the equations back to you if you'll provide an exact location.
Bill Holt
Yes, there are generalized equations which will closely approximate the same result, but they require that you solve for a series of coefficients by a iterative routine that's probably not worth your time to set up for a single case. Due to some work I've done in the past, I'm set up for it and will gladly kick the equations back to you if you'll provide an exact location.
Bill Holt
Guest
The area is Southern New Jersey. We have the intensities from the graphs, we are just trying to set up a storm sewer program in house that calculates the intensity after you plug in a Tc. We have it working right now but it is based on all data points not an equation of a line. It was very time consuming but it works. The equation of the line would be quicker to work with and probably more exact. But whatever you can give us is great. Thanks
Good news, bad news. I found my original work on this stuff (done a number of years ago for the same reason you're doing it) but don't seem to be able to locate my TP-40!
Here's the general equation. Other forms are possible, but I've found this to generate good result with an average error accross the table that is usually less than 1%.
Intensity = (LOG10(freq*mr+br)/(duration^B+C)
where:
intensity is in inches per hour
frequency is in years
duration is in minutes
For Nashville, TN, the coefficients are:
mr = 29.72093365
br = 45.42764707
B = 0.810701783
C = 5.414353427
Of course, you can multiply the intensities by the durations to return the rainfall amounts.
Give me the rainfall amounts (in inches) for the 6 hour storm at your location (for f = 2, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 year) and I'll run your coefficients.
Bill Holt
Here's the general equation. Other forms are possible, but I've found this to generate good result with an average error accross the table that is usually less than 1%.
Intensity = (LOG10(freq*mr+br)/(duration^B+C)
where:
intensity is in inches per hour
frequency is in years
duration is in minutes
For Nashville, TN, the coefficients are:
mr = 29.72093365
br = 45.42764707
B = 0.810701783
C = 5.414353427
Of course, you can multiply the intensities by the durations to return the rainfall amounts.
Give me the rainfall amounts (in inches) for the 6 hour storm at your location (for f = 2, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 year) and I'll run your coefficients.
Bill Holt
Note: Working out the coefficients from the 100 year data is probably the weakest approach, but my hunch is that it will probably still be ok. Your precision in reading from the map is a factor, as is the accuracy of the map.
mr = 36.31055551
br = 44.4089066
B = 0.81070128
C = 5.414311558
Be sure to check the results across a wide range of the mapped values. I'm accustomed to working in areas where the type 2 distribution is preferable, but my limited experience is that the results are also good for type 3 areas. (In fact, I've only had real problems coming up with a good set of coefficients for areas of the West Coast.)
Bill Holt
mr = 36.31055551
br = 44.4089066
B = 0.81070128
C = 5.414311558
Be sure to check the results across a wide range of the mapped values. I'm accustomed to working in areas where the type 2 distribution is preferable, but my limited experience is that the results are also good for type 3 areas. (In fact, I've only had real problems coming up with a good set of coefficients for areas of the West Coast.)
Bill Holt
I have a FORTRAN program that fits IDF curves to several common forms, you choose the best fit from the results. You have to supply (duration, intesity) pairs for a range of duration values (say, 5 min - 240 min, as from IDF curves). Works very nicely. I wrote the program so I could automate these calcs in spreadsheets. I'll e-mail it to you if you wish.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Question
- Locked
- Question
- Locked
- Question