×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

canard v rear control surfaces

canard v rear control surfaces

canard v rear control surfaces

(OP)
What are the advantages / disadvantages of having canard as opposed to rear control surfaces for an aircraft / missile?

RE: canard v rear control surfaces

For aircraft the canard loses in two out of three performance categories.  The canard wins the low speed controlability since it is easy to design so that it won't stall.

Canard 1, conv 0.

This same ability also means that you can't raise the nose at slow speed like takeoff so your takeoff ground run will be longer and you'll need a longer runway.

Canard 1, conv 1.

At cruise the canard will always have a higher wing loading or be closer to its max angle of attack since it has to stall first.  This is higher drag.

Canard 1, conv 2.

Now can you make a perfectly good airplane with a canard? Of course.  I've flown the Velocity (canard); it would be hard to find something easier to fly.  It just spends more time on the ground accelerating because it needs more speed to fly.

Now for a missle you wouldn't have the slow speed regime to worry about.  You would have an extra set of fins up front, additional drag.  You could probably make it turn quicker if that's a requirement.  Ordnance is often best accomplished with the lowest cost item that does the job.  Since I've never done anything with missles you might want to ignore this last paragraph and wait for someone more knowledgeable than me to weigh in, like my dog, anybody but me.

RE: canard v rear control surfaces

greebling,

You will find additional information in:

 FAQ2-760,Pros & Cons of Standard, Canard, and 3-Surface Airplane Configurations

If this reference doesn't link, go to the Aircraft Engineering thread and click on the FAQ tab at the top.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close