×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Design of built-up W sections for combined torsion and bending

Design of built-up W sections for combined torsion and bending

Design of built-up W sections for combined torsion and bending

(OP)
A current project in our office has required us to size a very large W-section. A height restriction of 24" has been set by the architect to make the beam more "interesting" for us. The beam spans 45' and with its cont. and point. loads must resist a 154K-ft moment.  We have just recently chosen to design a built-up beam that will consist of (2) W21x147 beams w/ a cont. 1/2" plate above and below. One of the point loads is 77k and must be set into the webs of one of the beams, thus generating a torsional moment on the beam. We have treated the built-up beam as an open and closed section while generating its properties(I,S,J, etc). We have been looking for additional information on such built-up/composite sections as we have not been able to calculate what we feel is an acceptable F.O.S. There may be alternative methods to generate the torsional properties of the beam or perhaps our approach has been incorrect. SO far LRFD methods have been used along with some theory from Timoshenko's mechanics book.
Does anyone have any experience with any beams of similar construction? Does anyone have additional concerns for the performance of the beam (welds, web stiffeners etc.)?
Although the W21x147 is not considered a HEAVY section will it be compatable with E70 Eloctrodes?
Thank you
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

RE: Design of built-up W sections for combined torsion and bending

IMHO,

   For the torsion strenght I would take in account only the section properties of an equivalent RHS formed by the two W's inner half flanges and their respective webs.. but this aproach depends on the welding arrangement utilized to join the W's and the cover plates.  When dealing with open
shapes, the torion can be "broken down" into St. Venant torsion (pure shear stresses) and Warping torsion (both shear stresses and axial/bending stresses as result you avoid to get in a very complex issue.

  You should check  AISC's Design Guide 9 and also Salmon & Johnson here you can find a very good theory discussion on
torsional stresses.

   See also SCI's advisory 249 Design of Members Subjected to Torsion

   

RE: Design of built-up W sections for combined torsion and bending

(OP)
IMHO-
Thank You for the response.
A full penetration weld at the flanges (top and Bottom) should allow us to consider the webs and connecting portions of flanges as a closed section.  The additional plates stiffen the flanges and we feel that the beam will perform well against localized stresses(i.e. warping shear) at these locations.
The issue we have is primarily in the webs of the (2) W sections. We have reviewed the AISC tutorial on the "Torsional Analysis of Steel Members" and have determined that the warping shear is the main problem.
The combination of bending and torsion stress approaches the limits of the Beam. We feel that web stiffeners at the locations of point loads on the beam will help stiffen the beam (The ends of the beam can also be considered torsionally pinned as the webs are braced).  
The outer edges of the flanges have been added to the calculation of our J-value by the LRFD equation: sum of (bt^3)/3.  We feel that this is acceptable when checking the beam under the combined stresses because the flanges do help resist the bending stress.
Is there an alternative method of calculating the Torsional property of the beam(J) that would more accurately reflect its behavior?

Again, Thank You for your response. We were hoping that some experience out there had some input.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close