×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

ASME Y14.5 Profile of Form

ASME Y14.5 Profile of Form

ASME Y14.5 Profile of Form

(OP)
Since I didn't get any response in the ASME forum, I thought I would try the question here.

One of our design groups is using Profile of Form for the shape of the part and then dimensioning the whole part with basic dimensions. I haven't seen this before, how common is it to use this method?

The group I normally work with uses an unspecified tolerance chart and normal diminesioning. With our designs in metric, we don't use trailing zeros so this has caused us some problems with manufacturing. Over the years the designers have gotten used to toleranceing dimensions that need it.

If I took a print of the same part and asked for a quote to build, would I get the same price? I think the drawing with the basic dimensions on it would be a higher price because of perception.

"Wildfires are dangerous, hard to control, and economically catastrophic."

Ben Loosli
CAD/CAM System Analyst
Ingersoll-Rand

RE: ASME Y14.5 Profile of Form

looslib,

   If your fabricator is scared of geometric tolerances, then they might put up the price.  I have had no problems to date with profile tolerances.

   If I have a cutout with a lot of radii, and without a requirement for very accurate dimensions, I go to the profile tolerances.  I think they are easier for me and for everyone else to understand.  Take the case of a specific radius.  With linear tolerances, the tolerance zone is controlled by two orthogonal linear dimensions and the radius.  Determining whether or not the as-fabricated form complies with this could require a lot of geometry.

   With a geometric form tolerance, you accept whatever shape stays within 0.1 of your nominal geometry, assuming you used a form tolerance of 0.2mm.  This has got to be easier to inspect.

   What sort of tolerances is your design group specifying?

   I do not recognize the idea that tolerances are not necessary.  Your drawing is part of a contract.  You want your fabricator to make you a widget, and you want to reject anything that does not conform to your drawing.  If you have no tolerances, everything conforms!

                             JHG

RE: ASME Y14.5 Profile of Form

I agree with Drawho, especially when I have a part (or feature) with a lot of simple geometry. I always utilize a profile control with all basic dimensions.  This is a far more simple way to control the part.  The "normal" tolerancing your speaking of is a suggestion to the manufacturer about what you want, not a specification.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - Strategies to Secure Connected Cars with Firewalls
White-hat hackers have demonstrated gaining remote access to dashboard functions and transmissions of connected vehicles. That makes a firewall a vital component of a multilayered approach to vehicle security as well as overall vehicle safety and reliability. Learn strategies to secure with firewalls. Download Now
White Paper - Model Based Engineering for Wire Harness Manufacturing
As complexity rises, current harness manufacturing methods are struggling to keep pace due to manual data exchanges and the inability to capture tribal knowledge. A model-based wire harness manufacturing engineering flow automates data exchange and captures tribal knowledge through design rules to help harness manufacturers improve harness quality and boost efficiency. Download Now
White Paper - What is Generative Design and Why Do You Need It?
Engineers are being asked to produce more sophisticated designs under a perfect storm of complexity, cost, and change management pressures. Generative design empowers automotive design teams to navigate this storm by employing automation, data re-use and synchronization, and framing design in the context of a full vehicle platform. Download Now
eBook - Simulation-Driven Design with SOLIDWORKS
Simulation-driven design can reduce the time and cost of product development. In this engineering.com eBook, we’ll explore how SOLIDWORKS users can access simulation-driven design through the SOLIDWORKS Simulation suite of analysis tools. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close