×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Optimum Shell/Diameter for Flat bottomed Tanks

Optimum Shell/Diameter for Flat bottomed Tanks

Optimum Shell/Diameter for Flat bottomed Tanks

(OP)
hello all....

I have seen several rules of thumb, field guides, comments and "old timers" suggestions but I have yet to see a good answer and the reasons for it..

Given a certain gallonage, what is the optimum flat bottomed tank diameter/shell height ? (Assume flat bottom, cone roof, vertical axis tank) I realize that this may include assumptions about plate height, but how are these figured in ???

Where did you get your reference or guideline and what was it based upon ???

Thanks..........................................MJC

RE: Optimum Shell/Diameter for Flat bottomed Tanks

MJC,

As you have also mentioned, many other things affect the "optimum" size of a tank.  Customer locations, siesmic and wind zones, foundation, ringwalls, etc...

Several codes/specifications have their own spin on tank sizing.  API-12F sizes them for you, and to be able to put the API nameplate on, the tank diameter and height must be that size.

UL-142 also has some "guidelines" for tank sizing with respect to gallonage.

As for API-620 and API-650, as well as most other codes, they are more concerned with the pressures the tank walls see during operation.  However, Appendix A, Tables A-1 through A-4, of API-650 give some sizes of tanks with respect to shell course height.

When a customer asked us to "size" the tank for them, we would first look at the following:  internal pressure, vacuum, wind and seismic zones, and field erection or shop built.

If the internal pressure and vacuum were 0 psi and in a high wind or seismic zone, we would size the tank with a large diameter diameter and low sidewall.  When internal pressure or vacuum was present, along with no, or low, wind or seismic zone, we would tend to make the tank taller.  There was a middle of the road mentality when we had all conditions or a mixture of internal, vacuum, wind, or seismic.  Hopefully some of the reasons we did the above are evident, if not will elaborate more later.

For shop built tanks, diameter was governed by permitting and road access.  I have designed shop fabricacted tanks with odd D/H ratios of .104 to .600, as well as several in between. For field erection, it generally went from .600 on up.

Other things that I always considered, regardless of how the pressures were finally defined or the seismic/wind zones were determined was the labor factor.  Welding on anchors, sub-arcing seams, joint preperation, erecting, and crane operating, to name a few played a very large role in costing.

So I would put all of the above factors together, along with customer feedback, etc... and come up with what I thought was the optimum size.

I hope in some sort of wway this has helped.

Scott

RE: Optimum Shell/Diameter for Flat bottomed Tanks

Here is another possible consideration to throw into the mix.  If you are going to agitate the tank with a propeller type mixer, the height to diameter ratio can impact the mixer selection.  Generally, for a top-entering agitator with a vertical shaft, a height to diameter ratio of 0.80 to 1.2 is optimum for mixing. Mixers can be successfully applied in other tanks, it just starts to affect the selection and increase the cost.  
For side entry mixers with horizontal shafts, large diameter tanks with relatively short sides are preferable.
There are special cases and many other factors that can affect mixing, but it is something to think about in design, along with the many other factors.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close