Using O2 sensors to tune a running engine
Using O2 sensors to tune a running engine
(OP)
I'm considering putting an O2 sensor in my exhaust system to aid in tuning. However, I have zero experience using O2 sensors and do not know their limitations and tendencies.
The current set-up is:
4.3L V-6 Even fire Chevy
VP C-10 unleaded racing fuel
4 bbl Q-Jet carburetor
6 into 2 stepped racing headers
Drag racing
My goal is to use the O2 sensor to help shape the fuel curve while testing on the drag strip (can’t afford dyno time yet). First shot at tuning will be to read raw voltage off the sensor, then possibly the raw signal into a data acquisition system.
The research I've done shows two main types of sensors are used, narrow and wide band sensors. The narrow is generally a 2 or 3 wire sensor that shows relative lean/rich conditions and are generally very non-linear. Rich is above 450 mV and lean is below 450 mV. You can use them to tune, but true AFR accuracy between two different "identical" sensors may show different readings for the same AFR, so when a sensor takes a dump it may be somewhat difficult to reestablish a baseline. Plus, leaded fuel poisons the sensor. Wide band O2 sensors are accurate and generally linear, yet much more expensive.
My first thought is to use a basic narrow, heated sensor and hook it up to a digital voltmeter to read in the car. I am concerned with the response time and/or the readings the O2 will give, mostly a very jumpy signal reading directly from the sensor.
What are you thoughts and recommendations?
The current set-up is:
4.3L V-6 Even fire Chevy
VP C-10 unleaded racing fuel
4 bbl Q-Jet carburetor
6 into 2 stepped racing headers
Drag racing
My goal is to use the O2 sensor to help shape the fuel curve while testing on the drag strip (can’t afford dyno time yet). First shot at tuning will be to read raw voltage off the sensor, then possibly the raw signal into a data acquisition system.
The research I've done shows two main types of sensors are used, narrow and wide band sensors. The narrow is generally a 2 or 3 wire sensor that shows relative lean/rich conditions and are generally very non-linear. Rich is above 450 mV and lean is below 450 mV. You can use them to tune, but true AFR accuracy between two different "identical" sensors may show different readings for the same AFR, so when a sensor takes a dump it may be somewhat difficult to reestablish a baseline. Plus, leaded fuel poisons the sensor. Wide band O2 sensors are accurate and generally linear, yet much more expensive.
My first thought is to use a basic narrow, heated sensor and hook it up to a digital voltmeter to read in the car. I am concerned with the response time and/or the readings the O2 will give, mostly a very jumpy signal reading directly from the sensor.
What are you thoughts and recommendations?
RE: Using O2 sensors to tune a running engine
If you do go the cheaper way, I have done testing with the sensor wired directly to 12V for the heater (most sensors are heated) and the signal feed to an ADC (analogue to digital converter) with no significant problems, if the signal is noisy (from HT interference for example) you can shield the signal cable. Good luck.
RE: Using O2 sensors to tune a running engine
If you need tuning help on the Quadrajet side, I have tons of experience including an NHRA SuperStock national title.
Shaun TiedeULTRADYNE Arl,TX(stiede@ev1.net)
RE: Using O2 sensors to tune a running engine
Would a digital volt meter be the same as an analogue to digital converter? Also, what is "HT" interference?
Shaun,
What can you share about tuning the Q-Jet? Idealy, I think a constant A/F ratio throughout the operating range should be best for best performance. If this is true, can a Q-Jet accomplish this and how would this be done?
Thanks!
RE: Using O2 sensors to tune a running engine
Shaun TiedeULTRADYNE Arl,TX(stiede@ev1.net)
RE: Using O2 sensors to tune a running engine
http://www.diy-efi.org/
Good info on WB O2s
RE: Using O2 sensors to tune a running engine
The volt meter is essentially the same as an ADC but you can record or view an ADC input on a computer and thus look at it later and also sample at a higher rate than a volt meter may update at. The HT reference is High Tension as in 10,000V through the HT leads between the coils and spark plugs. This electrical noise is a common issue in current production vehicles and a lot of effort (and legislation) is required to ensure EMC (Electro Magnetic Compatability) requirements are met.
RE: Using O2 sensors to tune a running engine
Andy
RE: Using O2 sensors to tune a running engine
Shaun TiedeULTRADYNE Arl,TX(stiede@ev1.net)
RE: Using O2 sensors to tune a running engine
There is a linearisation curve for switching sensors (see Bosch Automotive Handbook) which does describe lambda as a function of voltage output. It's how post catalyst sensors are used as fuelling trim. In terms of the effect of temperature on the shape of the curve I'm pretty sure that it's also a 'switch', ie. above a certain temperature (~300°C) they work, below they don't. I've certainly never experienced the characteristics of the sensor changing with temperature once they are warm enough to operate.
RE: Using O2 sensors to tune a running engine
As for the temperature effect, Heywood shows that changing exhaust temps from 900 to 1300F (a change which could easily occur from low to high load) will change the output a full 100mV. If you are only tuning WOT, then maybe the swing will not be as much, but I don't think you'll be able to maintain one exhaust temp throughout the range of your engine map
I do admit ignorance on the use of post-cat oxygen sensors, but I thought they were used primarily as indicators of catalyst efficiency. The response of a secondary sensor would be more gradual for a couple reasons:
1. The cat stores and releases oxygen in a cycle much slower than the engine's transition from rich to lean, creating a broader waveform
2. More constant temperature and pressure
Nonetheless, I still don't think eaxct voltages are measured for fueling changes. I think the ecu is still just looking to make sure that it is going rich-lean-rich, and not staying lean longer than it stays rich or vice-versa.
Andy
RE: Using O2 sensors to tune a running engine
The PCM is looking for constant switching, but also the duty times at each switch. Ideally, we would like to see 50% duty times, indicating a stoich mixture. Duty times over 50% (about .450 V) and the PCM recognizes a richer mixture and begins to modify the fuel mapping tables to take fuel away (negative fuel trim) and vice versa. The sensor manufacturers purposely setup the output of the sensor to be non-linear during the middle of the output to indicate a change in fuel mixture for this reason.
Using an averaging voltage feature with a 2 or 3 second refresh on a digital volt meter with a switching sensor will yield some interesting results. You can also use the averaging feature on duty cycle. True, linear wide range sensors give a pretty accurate picture of what is happening, especially if you intend to run in high Lambda regions where a switching sensor is relatively inaccurate.
I have tuned many hundreds of engines at stoich with the $25.00 Bosch sensor and the DVOM. Since most catalysts are formulated for stoich mixtures, and comparing pre and post cat sensors is a function of both OBD-II and many tuners, it makes good sense to use a switching sensor.
When using a non-electronic controlled carburetor, switching is relatively non-existent, whereas an electronic carburetor or fuel injection constantly switches.
Franz
RE: Using O2 sensors to tune a running engine
My point is that you can scale the linearisation curve of the switching sensor (it is done in ME7 as the whole closed loop fuelling control including rear trim is done in the lambda domain). The problem is, because of the relatively flat response either side of the switch point the resolution of the sensor is quite poor, ie mV/AFR is a small number, therefore to accurately describe the lambda you need a very fine quantisation of the signal (at least 12bit).
It's all a bit academic really as the engine in question is carb fed so the accuracy and repeatability are going to be far outside the levels of detail we're discussing. Interesting debate though :)
RE: Using O2 sensors to tune a running engine
Andy
RE: Using O2 sensors to tune a running engine
EGT is the only way to go.
RE: Using O2 sensors to tune a running engine
AFR is very important (particularly in a racing application)as the max power occurs rich of stoichiometric (lambda 0.9) and not at a fixed exhaust temperature (which is very much a factor of spark timing).
RE: Using O2 sensors to tune a running engine
I do often wonder why they are used in aircraft Could it be they are useful in a constant speed application ?
Victory M.S. a carbureted drag car fuel curve does not nescessarily want to be completey flat
Tom
RE: Using O2 sensors to tune a running engine
RE: Using O2 sensors to tune a running engine
Retarded ignition timing, low compression, out of phase cam timing, can all lead to a high exhaust temp, even with the final engine out fuel mixture at or very near stoich.
Using EGT to tune an engine is fine, as long as you have an exact temp where that specific engine is at stoich, and a scale to show the AF/EGT for that specific engine.
Using a CO meter is fine, but it does not accurately reflect a lean condition. I still like a real world O2 sensor, linear UEGO if possible, but a switching sensor at minimum. As far as not reacting quickly enough? A modern freshly seasoned sensor can show individual firing impulses on an O-scope. That's pretty quick. The last Type K I used took about 2 seconds to reflect a change of 100 deg F.
Franz