Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

About Geopiers

About Geopiers

About Geopiers


Just in general. What you guys think about Geopiers? And what you guys think about stone columns?
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

RE: About Geopiers

Both are excellent, relatively new technologies that offer potential solutions in certain applications that may be less expensive alternatives than more conventional solutions.  Do your research and read up on case histories, etc.  I've seen geopiers used successfully in a variety of conditions involving fairly thin (less than 12 feet) layers of poor overburden.

I also think the certified installer offers some sort of performance warranty on them.

RE: About Geopiers

Stone columns installed by an experienced, reputable contractor with the latest equipment provide more quality control than a geopier installation.  Specifically, the newer equipment provides computer print-outs immediatly after completing a column, which provides information such as volume of stone, energy to compact stone, depth, etc.  All of which are important when analyzing an installation.  Also, bottom feed stone column installation allows stone columns to be built at depths greater than geopiers, and at depths below the water table.

RE: About Geopiers

Computer QC is nice and easy.  But Geopier installers log the soil excavated, and the aggregate lifts for every geopier installed on a site.  In California, Geopier has gained wide acceptance in the building foundation market.  More so than stone columns for 2 distinct reasons, 1) Geopier elements can resist much greater amounts of foundation stress due to higher stiffness than stone columns (5 to 25 times stiffer) and 2) Geopier elements can resist uplift forces caused by earthquakes or wind with a steel anchor cage.  Stone columns are a good application for potentially liquefiable high groundwater clean sands.

Geopier is also quick and is relatively low cost when matched with a spread footing foundation.  Geopiers have been successfully delivered on sites with soft clays to depths of 30 feet.  Keep in mind, Geopiers are an intermediate foundation and oftentimes a good alternate to driven piles and concrete piers.  We've used Geopiers for several multi-story building projects in California.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close