×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current
4

Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

(OP)
3 Ph, 415 V, 50 Hz 4 wire, neutral solidly earthed system feeding a high school with 3 phase ac's, LED & fluorescent lamps, ceiling fans, UPS systems for computers, lab equipments etc.

Current and voltage THD's in each phase <3%.

Current harmonics 3rd to 13th less than 0.5% in all 3 phases as per below photo

RY – 400 V YB – 401 V BR – 402 V

R – 135 A Y – 188 A B – 167 A

Using the formula, neutral current = Sqrt [(R^2 + Y^2 + B^2 – RY – YB – BR)], I get 46 A. (Online calculators also give 46 A neutral current).

But the measured neutral current is only 18 Amps.

Would appreciate any explanations.



Muthu
www.edison.co.in

Replies continue below

Recommended for you

RE: Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

2
Neutral current should be = Vector sum of currents in all three phases. So, you need phasor angless.

RE: Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

Those numbers may make sense on a "High Leg" delta system, maybe not but have to ask. eg:

--------------------
Ohm's law
Not just a good idea;
It's the LAW!

RE: Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

My experience with unexpected neutral currents was with a single phase system when the neutral was unexpectedly high.
That was a power factor issue.
One line to neutral load was at a very low power factor,the other at a much better power factor.
On single phase, it is easy to see that any power factor, or phase angle difference, will increase the current, not decrease it.
But shushilksk's post kicked my mind into gear.
It may not be safe to assume that the entire current difference is phase to neutral current.
I suspect that you have unbalanced line to line loads that are not affecting the neutral current.
And you may have unbalanced line to line power factors which will drive up the line to line unbalance but not affect the neutral current.
(Thanks for the mind jog, shushilksk)

--------------------
Ohm's law
Not just a good idea;
It's the LAW!

RE: Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

"..RY – 400 V YB – 401 V BR – 402 V. R– 135 A Y – 188 A B – 167 A...
But the measured neutral current is only 18 Amps".

I have the following opinion, please advise.
1. Voltage is balance. Current is not. This big current difference can happen on a 3-ph Y system, with 1-ph unbalanced linear or non-linear load.
2. Note: A. For linear loads:
a) 3-ph balance loads, the Neutral current is Zero.
b) 3-ph unbalanced loads, Neutral current is NOT Zero. But the vector I1+I2+I3+IN =0.
B. For non-linear (harmonic generating) loads:
a) 3-ph balance loads, the Neutral current is NOT Zero. The fundamental (frequency) current is Zero. The Neutral current = sum of harmonic currents.
b) 3-ph unbalanced loads, Neutral current is NOT Zero. The Neutral current = sum of harmonic currents + the fundamental (frequency) unbalance current.
3. The current reading R-135 A, Y-188 A, B–167 A, and N-18A, these are the [fundamental + the harmonics].
Note: Take the case say 3 non-linear balance loads, the fundamental current is Zero. The Neutral reads the harmonic currents, which is possible to be not very heavy. However, if the non-linear loads are unbalanced, the Neutral current is the [unbalanced fundamental frequency current + the Harmonic currents ].
Che Kuan Yau (Singapore)

RE: Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

(OP)
Phase angles imbalance. Completely forgot it.

Thanks, sushil and jghrist. Will check the current waveforms and come back.

Muthu
www.edison.co.in

RE: Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

How about single phase load, A-B, single phase load B-C, single phase load C-A.
The neutral does not need to be present to connect single phase loads phase to phase.
Unbalanced phase to phase loads will change the phase angles, but will not cause a neutral current.
The neutral only carries the unbalanced current from line to neutral loads.
Please check and report on single phase,line to line loads.
Some three phase equipment may have internal devices such as heaters that cause unbalanced line to line loading WITHOUT CAUSING ANY NEUTRAL CURRENT.
With single phase, line to line loads disconnected, your neutral current should be as expected.
Unbalanced line to line loading must be eliminated and the neutral current measured and calculated on the remaining line to neutral unbalance.

--------------------
Ohm's law
Not just a good idea;
It's the LAW!

RE: Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

Or, my favorite (?). Gotten calls from the field that transformer relay and the "multi-function meter" were showing radically different transformer neutral currents. Short story is that the MFM was displaying RMS current, a big number, while the relay was displaying fundamental current (a much smaller number). Apples and oranges...

When one this sentence into the German to translate wanted, would one the fact exploit, that the word order and the punctuation already with the German conventions agree.

-- Douglas Hofstadter, Jan 1982

RE: Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

Quote (Short story is that the MFM was displaying RMS current, a big number, while the relay was displaying fundamental current (a much smaller number). Apples and oranges...)


In this case THD is 2.7% and difference in neutral current is >50%. There should be some other issue.

RE: Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

(OP)
3 phase input RMS current waveform.


3 phase input THD current waveform


Do you see much of a phase angle difference here?

There are no 400 V (RY, YB or BR) single phase loads.

Only 3 phase air conditioners, UPS for computer systems, LED lights, fans.

Muthu
www.edison.co.in

RE: Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

(OP)
UPS
3 ph, 10 KVA - 2 nos.
3 ph, 5 KVA - 2 nos.
1 ph, 5 KVA - 1 no

Muthu
www.edison.co.in

RE: Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

I have the following opinion for your consideration. Please advise.
1. Base on the Irms readings:
IRrms = 136.3A, IYrms = 188.2A, IBrms=168.9A
Note: Irms = I fundamental (with 0, -120, -240o angles)+ harmonics (without angle).
2. Base on the THD% R = 3.2%, Y = 2.5%, B =2.6%
3. Base on above 1. and 2., the fundamental f0 current IR0= 136.24A /angle 0o, IY0= 187.25A /angle -120 o, IB0= 168.84A / angle -240 o.
3.1 Note: Sum of 3 fundamental 120 deg apart currents with 1-phase loads on RN, YN, BN only = unbalance current = about 4.2A, . Excluding the Harmonic.
4. The actual current on the Neutral = unbalance current (4.2A) + the Harmonics.
4.1 Note: As the Harmonics are NOT very high, the Neutral current reads 18A is possible.
Che Kuan Yau (Singapore)

RE: Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

Quote:

There are no 400 V (RY, YB or BR) single phase loads.

Only 3 phase air conditioners, UPS for computer systems, LED lights, fans.


There are line to neutral 230V single phase loads though, right? Otherwise, there should be no neutral current.

RE: Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

Quote (Edison123)

Do you see much of a phase angle difference here?
Note that B peaks considerably after the crossing of R&Y. This would occur if the angles of R&Y were 0 and -120, and the angle of B was 100 deg.

Try moving the cursor on the meter to determine the zero crossing times of the three currents.

RE: Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

Looking at the loading type, we should be asking what is the frequency of the neutral current? There maybe more harmonic than you expect. In the worst case the neutral can be up to three times any phase current.
LED lighting, and UPS systems can be very dirty switching power supplies that generate loads of harmonics.
As David said above, the current read on different devices can be a big clue.

RE: Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

(OP)
Caveat. Today's readings at low loads of 40 Amps (not the previous ones).

Also, there is a voltage regulation problem from utility side (430 V on low load to 370 V on high load).

Current phasor (low load)



Voltage phasor (low load



Will post high load phasors later.

Muthu
www.edison.co.in

RE: Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

(OP)
Current phasor with full load




Voltage phasor with full load (75 to 80 V drop in voltage with full load. Utility has been informed about poor regulation)




3 phase current THD on full load (not much)




Measured neutral current 16 Amps with Fluke clamp-on.

Muthu
www.edison.co.in

RE: Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

What is the neutral current at low load?

--------------------
Ohm's law
Not just a good idea;
It's the LAW!

RE: Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

What do the angles phi_12, phi_23, phi_31 represent?

RE: Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

(OP)
Neutral current at low load was 2 Amps

jghrist - The angles between the phasors A1, A2 and A3? How would you plug in these angles in your Excel sheet?

Muthu
www.edison.co.in

RE: Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current


For Full Load

CODE -->

Phase        Mag  	Angle deg	Angle Rad	Real	    Im
R	    180.2	    0	            0	        180.2	    0
Y	    208.1	  -119	         -2.08	       -100.89	  -182.01
B	    191.4	   119 	          2.08	        -92.79     167.40
N	    19.88			                -13.48     -14.61 

Note that angles are only given to zero decimals. If the 119 angles were 118.5, then N would be 18.0 A.

RE: Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

edison123.
I have great respect for you.
It worries me that we cannot find a solution.
As you know, uneven voltages may cause disproportionate current differences.
Motors are noted for this.
The amount of difference depends on the motor impedance, the voltage difference compared to the back EMF and to the source impedance.
Your readings are typical of either single phase line to line loads or unequal currents caused by enequal supply voltages.
A suggestion;
If possible measure the neutral current of each line to neutral load on each phase and correlate that with your neutral current.
Turn off individual motor loads and check for any change in neutral current and check the change in line currents.
Beware that some three phase equipment may have internal line to line single phase loads such as heaters and or fans.
Respectfully yours
Bill

--------------------
Ohm's law
Not just a good idea;
It's the LAW!

RE: Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

(OP)
Thanks jghrist . Your calculation tracks what I measured at neutral. If I may ask, how did you arrive at 0, 119, 119 angles ?

waross - Input voltages are pretty much equal. It's regulation that is the issue. I had the utility guy measure the voltages at their transformer end, which is about 600 ft away, from low load to full load. Transformer output stayed constant at 430 V. The issue is the too small overhead line from the transformer to our school. They will address it by increasing the line cs or stringing a second line. LED's and fans are single phase loads and are spread evenly in three phases as you can see at full load. At inevitable partial loads (service factor), there are bound to be unbalanced currents. Also, as you said, all 3 phase ac's have their outdoor unit fans connected to the same phase, which would create some unbalance. I am addressing the ac fans issue by shifting single phase loads from that phase to the other two phases. At the end of the day, we will have to live with some current unbalance, which is not a big deal.

Muthu
www.edison.co.in

RE: Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

Quote:

Also, as you said, all 3 phase ac's have their outdoor unit fans connected to the same phase, which would create some unbalance. I am addressing the ac fans issue by shifting single phase loads from that phase to the other two phases.
My point; Phase to phase unbalance does not create neutral current. Hence the incorrect results from the incomplete formula.

--------------------
Ohm's law
Not just a good idea;
It's the LAW!

RE: Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

I arbitrarily chose 0° for the R (A1) phase angle. The difference between R & Y phase angles is 119° per the meter (Phi 12), so Y phase angle is 0 - 119 = -119°. The difference between B & R phase angles is 119° (Phi 31), so B phase angle is 0 + 119 = 119°.

RE: Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

(OP)
Thanks jghrist. Got it. Would it work if another phase is taken as 0 deg? (Wish I could give more LPS).

Muthu
www.edison.co.in

RE: Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

As long as you are looking at the difference of currents it should be OK, but, using an arbitrary base for the angle reference, if the arbitrary angle assignment crosses the base line so that the PF goes from negative to positive on one phase, will the calculations still work?
I don't know.
I am asking not challenging.

--------------------
Ohm's law
Not just a good idea;
It's the LAW!

RE: Calculated neutral current not matching measured neutral current

If you use another phase for the 0°, you will get a different answer, but only because the angles are rounded to zero decimals. Note that the sum of all of the phase angle differences has to equal exactly 360°, but 119 + 119 + 123 = 361.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close