×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Bearing failure, but a weird one

Bearing failure, but a weird one

Bearing failure, but a weird one

(OP)
Dear engineers,

I have a failed bearing case but I was scratching my head on the cause of this. Bearing is a 62082RS Deep Groove ball bearing.

Design background: Bearing was used in a scissor lift for a rubber track carrier transporter. on each side, it has 2 bearings stacked together. I got the report that one of the bearings was toast. When it was brought back, the outer ring and bearing balls were missing. inspection on the inner ring looks mint to my naked eye, but when zoomed in with a camera, it seems like a pit on the inner ring but I need sharp eyes and opinion. My only thought was that this is due to misalignment, or the bearing was twisted out. The bearing race seems to have an inner dent at 12 o'clock, and stretched cage at 5 and 7 o'clock. the entire bearing race seemed "curved".

Appreciate your input.

-Dawson





Replies continue below

Recommended for you

RE: Bearing failure, but a weird one

That inner ring is severely damaged. The missing outer race and damage to the inner indicates that the bearing was severely overloaded.

RE: Bearing failure, but a weird one

(OP)
Okay, looks like a change for a bigger bearing. If severely overloaded, the bearing ball might be fratured too? I was thinking if deep groove design is not suitable for this application.

Will stacking another bearing add up to the static and dynamic load capacity?

RE: Bearing failure, but a weird one

If you are experiencing significant axial loads you should consider a bearing with better axial load capacity. If you can stack two bearings then tapered roller bearings would likely be ideal.

RE: Bearing failure, but a weird one

I would carefully examine the track the bearing was running on.

RE: Bearing failure, but a weird one

(OP)

Quote (TugboatEng)

If you are experiencing significant axial loads you should consider a bearing with better axial load capacity. If you can stack two bearings then tapered roller bearings would likely be ideal.

Thank you for the suggestion. If bucket, if stacked (heaps, fruit) can reach to 2 tons, but in general it's a bout 1 ton plus. When bucket is jacked up high, it can be wobbly if bucket is not lowered down during traveling.

Quote (3DDave)

I would carefully examine the track the bearing was running on.

A possible obstruction.. like bearings that "climb" over it?

This is the specification for this bearing, seems strong, considering it has 2 stacked bearings on each side (left side - 2 bearings, right side - 2 bearings.)

RE: Bearing failure, but a weird one

It does not appear to me there is any room allowed for the bearing to climb over anything. This would be in keeping with the need for resistance to any vertical movement at the base of a scissor lift link.

RE: Bearing failure, but a weird one

(OP)

CODE --> 3DDave

It does not appear to me there is any room allowed for the bearing to climb over anything. This would be in keeping with the need for resistance to any vertical movement at the base of a scissor lift link. 

If a stacked bearing does not seat completely on the track, will it also cause one of the bearings to take all the load and suffer damage, even if it's just a slightly irregular track?

RE: Bearing failure, but a weird one

(OP)
Will this be an acceptable design for the scissor lift? There is a 1mm gap for the plain bearing.

https://res.cloudinary.com/engineering-com/image/upload/v1709861441/tips/Drawing1-Layout1_rfiiup.pdf

As for reading bearing load capacity:

6208:
Static Load Capacity: 19kN
Dynamic Load Capacity: 32.5kN

GEH40ES:
Static Load Capacity: 640kN
Dynamic Load Capacity: 127kN

Is it alright to directly assume that the plain bearing has a "640kN / 19kN = 33.6 times" static load capacity compared to 6208?

And, i always hear people say "how many kg can this bearing handle?". How to actually know the radial load a particular bearing can handle? It's not just purely converting kN to kg from the static/dynamic load right?

For moderate sandy/muddy location, is 2RS (rubber seal) necessary?



Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close