×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Increasing in Bearing Capacity with Depth and Width (Cookies Cutter Geotech Report Recommendations)

Increasing in Bearing Capacity with Depth and Width (Cookies Cutter Geotech Report Recommendations)

Increasing in Bearing Capacity with Depth and Width (Cookies Cutter Geotech Report Recommendations)

(OP)
Hello All

I am trying to become more proficient in writing geotechnical reports and providing recommendations but sometimes get frustrated by things that just don't make logical sense in the industry.

I am from Southern California and all reports I have seen (from other companies) have a sentence about increase of allowable soils bearing capacity with depth and/or width. I am not sure how they calculate these percents or number increases. It seems made up to me (prove me wrong). Is this normal verbage in all geotechnical reports in other parts of the USA ? Increase in 20% per ft of depth and 10% per ft of width seems the easiest for me to place in every report lol. I will list a few examples from other reports below:

Example Company 1: "May be increased by 100 psf for every footing width and 400 psf for every footing depth to a maximum allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf."

Example Company 2: "An allowable soil bearing capacity of 1,500 pounds per square foot may be utilized for design of isolated 24-inch-square footings founded at a minimum depth of 12 inches below the lowest adjacent final grade for pad footings that are not a part of the slab system and are used for support of such features as roof overhang, second-story decks, patio covers, etc. This value may be increased by 20 percent for each additional foot of depth and by 10 percent for each additional foot of width, to a maximum value of 2,500 pounds per square foot."

Example Company 3: " The bearing values may be increased by 10 percent for each additional foot of embedment and/or width, to a maximum value of 2500 psf."

Example Company 4" "The allowable bearing pressure may be increased by 500 psf for every additional foot of width and by 800 for every additional foot of embedment depth up to a maximum of 4,000 psf."

I appreciate your input.

Replies continue below

Recommended for you

RE: Increasing in Bearing Capacity with Depth and Width (Cookies Cutter Geotech Report Recommendations)

The real reason is that a large number of geotechnical engineers, especially at smaller firms, are essentially useful idiots. What you'll probably find is that presenting the numbers those way is convenient for the structural engineers design and also transfers liability away from the structural engineer, and structural engineers / engineering firms simply refer to or recommend using the geotechs that help them this way.

Unfortunately that's the sad state of the industry in alot of places.

RE: Increasing in Bearing Capacity with Depth and Width (Cookies Cutter Geotech Report Recommendations)

If you look at Terzaghis bearing cap formula it’s pretty self evident that bearing cap is a function of width and depth of footing…

RE: Increasing in Bearing Capacity with Depth and Width (Cookies Cutter Geotech Report Recommendations)

Quote (op)

Is this normal verbage in all geotechnical reports in other parts of the USA ?

Not in the areas I have practiced (southern New England and Colorado).

We provide a net allowable bearing pressure for footings. We provide minimum footing dimensions and depth. The net allowable bearing pressure for footings less than three feet wide is reduced proportionately.

RE: Increasing in Bearing Capacity with Depth and Width (Cookies Cutter Geotech Report Recommendations)

Here in NZ most geotechnical reports are written with reference to a paper by Stockwell in 1971 (lol literally the most up to date info we have...)
This has simplified formula for changing bearing pressures depending on footing width and depth

Generally, depth always increases the capacity
However, the width only increases the capacity of isolated footings (pads) in sand
Otherwise, wider footings in sand w adjacent slabs, silts, or clays decrease the capacity

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close