×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Help With PE Example Problem

Help With PE Example Problem

Help With PE Example Problem

(OP)
Hello,

I am finishing up preparing for the Civil PE in Geotech and this example problem has left me a bit stumped (see attached).

I know that you have to equate uplift forces to the weight of the concrete and the bond resistance, however the solution doesn't state how they come up with certain input parameters.
Pu = 62.4 x 20 x 9 x 1.5
Wc = 150 x 20 + (2 x 1250)

Any guidance on how the value of 9 as an input parameter was determined would be very helpful.

RE: Help With PE Example Problem

Looks to me the calcs don't match the figure.
The calcs would make sense if was 20' vs 60' between the walls, as 20 is used in both calcs.
Also, water table 9' above base vs 60' in the figure.

With the dimensions given, I get 30' concrete required, which would be nuts.
With 20' space and 9' submergence, I get 3' thick.


RE: Help With PE Example Problem

(OP)

Quote (CarlB)

Carl, thank you for the confirmation. I don't believe the given solution and the given information in the problem are accurate.

RE: Help With PE Example Problem

According to the sketch, water inside the cofferdam is at the top of the tremie. Assuming that the 1,250 lbs per side is per VF of tremie per LF of cofferdam and that the 60 feet to bottom of submerged tremie is correct, I get T = 25.2' which is still significant. See calcs. If this were a real design situation, why not drive SSP deeper to prevent boiling and eliminate the tremie seal?



www.PeirceEngineering.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close