Liner reliability for large API 653 storage tanks?
Liner reliability for large API 653 storage tanks?
(OP)
We utilize maybe 5 1M-3M tanks in ammonium sulfate salt service and it feels like every year we’re having a liner fail on us. Had one liner repaired a year ago and during normal operating conditions it failed again. These are considerable repairs each time. They are 40-45 mil polypropylene liners for reference on carbon steel shells with a fiber geo between them.
Beyond the obviously more expensive option of an enormous tank farm that could support 3M tanks, are there any alternatives or retrofits we should be evaluating as we take these systems down?
Beyond the obviously more expensive option of an enormous tank farm that could support 3M tanks, are there any alternatives or retrofits we should be evaluating as we take these systems down?
Talk To Other Members
RE: Liner reliability for large API 653 storage tanks?
Ammonium sulfate is not extremely corrosive. Why these tanks need a PP liner? Which standard was implemented for lining? Please describe in details equipment and liquid.
RE: Liner reliability for large API 653 storage tanks?
There is a fiber geo that protects the liner from any rust spots on the tank. This creates the potential for condensate to collect in between the tank wall (between liner & shell) that saturate the geo and require periodic pump-out.
RE: Liner reliability for large API 653 storage tanks?
You need to describe these tanks better.
API 653 is for inspection and repair of API 650 tanks.
"This standard covers carbon and low alloy steel tanks
built to API Standard 650 and its predecessor API 12C. This
standard provides minimum requirements for maintaining the
integrity of welded or riveted, nonrefrigerated, atmospheric
pressure, aboveground storage tanks after they have been
placed in service. It covers the maintenance inspection,
repair, alteration, relocation, and reconstruction of such tanks. "
Therefore there is no such thing as an API 653 tank.
You're going to need top provide some drawings, sketches or photos so we understand what you mean.
You haven't answered the question about what 1M to 3M means. 1 million somethings? Gallons, barrels, litres, cubic metres, ????
Lined ponds fail frequently , especially at corners or where the liner becomes loose or folded as it is exposed to the sun.
90% of the issues lie in the installation of these liners and if you are already calling them a "low cost solution", my guess is that you take the lowest quote for the installation. This, as you can see, is a false economy.
I also struggle to see how this is classified as "double containment". The whole thing sounds very like a swerve around the regulations to me.
DO you store this as a liquid of granules?
Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.
RE: Liner reliability for large API 653 storage tanks?
This gives a good explanation of the tank. My apologies for mis-speaking yes it is an API 650 tank that’s inspected to API 653. The tanks are in an ammonium thiosulfate solution - not granules.
I intended gallons my apologies there. These sorts of tanks are common in liquid non-combustible fertilizer service and are traditionally a low cost option for coops and farming collectives. From a design standpoint they are pretty robust for preventing any loss of containment issues assuming leak testing is done regularly.
Unfortunately I’m not in a position to impact future installs of these tanks. If you’re not familiar with the tank design and your feedback is to go with a better design then I guess we’re in the same boat!
Appreciate the response regardless.