×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Autoclave venting & compression moulding with condensation reaction polymers

Autoclave venting & compression moulding with condensation reaction polymers

Autoclave venting & compression moulding with condensation reaction polymers

(OP)
I have reviewed some of the previous advice from 'Compositepro', so my questions are mostly directed at them but please anyone feel free to comment.

I am researching optimal process parameters for a phenolic type prepreg with a polycondensation curing reaction.

I believe the best way to reduce porosity in the resin is to drive out as much water before the point of gelation. Trying to get my head around the difference between a vacuum bagging & vacuum chamber, and when the resin will start to boil in a vacuum bag depending on the pressure/temperature. For example if the resin was held at 60C, with vac bag recording 28inHg, but the autoclave pressure was set to 2bar - would the resin boil?

Then onto the subject of venting, when would it make the most sense to vent with these types of resin? The resin gels in around 15minute at 100°C, so I'd prefer to vent at a lower temperature, but then would the benefits from boiling the volatiles be lost?

It was mentioned that 'traps to condense and collect these volatiles do not work under vacuum' - is this because the water will boil within the vacuum trap?

You talked about venting vacuum at 20psig being bad practice if the resin is not at temperature - if you were to do this on a de-bulked panel, have you wasted time de-bulking the plies?

Finally, with compression moulding - again the the aim would be to boil off volatiles before the gelation point. This could be achieved by burping the press at temperatures/pressures close to 100C. Then apply an absolute pressure which ensures the boiling point of water is above the cure temperature to prevent unwanted volatilization from the additional water being evolved in the curing reaction?
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

RE: Autoclave venting & compression moulding with condensation reaction polymers

You are asking many different questions,so I may not address them all. It is easier for all to deal with only one at a time.

Yes, a vacuum bag is not a vacuum chamber, and it is critical to understand the distinction. A chamber has inflexible, self-supporting walls so that there can be different pressures on each side of the walls. A bag is a thin, flexible film that cannot support a pressure difference from one side to the other. The purpose of the film is to be impermeable to gas, although everything is permeable to some degree, and sometimes this is important. Polymer films are surprisingly permeable to many gasses, but this is often overlooked with no problem.

Dry, woven or non-woven fabrics that are permeable to gas flow (breathers) are used under the vacuum-bag to maintain open channels for gas flow while supporting the compaction pressure of the bag. It is important to understand that compaction pressure is not a hydrostatic pressure. It is a force that has direction (perpendicular to the bagging film) that is applied to the surface area of a solid (the breather and the composite part under the bag. On the outside of the bag you have the hydrostatic pressure of atmosphere or autoclave. On the inside of the bag you have the hydrostatic pressure in the pores of the breather and part and the compaction pressure. The total pressure on either side of the bagging film are are always equal.

A major complication is that there are many different cure processes for composite parts that work, but the specific details that make each one work correctly are different for each one. Often some detail that may be essential for one process are inappropriately specified in a different process. For example, bleed-cures are different than no-bleed-cures. Compression molding is different than vacuum-bagging, and oven curing is different than autoclave curing.

Now, phenolic resins are condensation cure, meaning water is a product of the cure reaction. Phenolics are one of the first commercial plastics, and have traditionally been processed in compression molds under more than 1000 psi. At this pressure the water remains in the resin after cure, either dissolved or phase separated as microscopic droplets. This water diffuses out of the part during postcure, and care must be taken to heat parts slowly enough that they don't explode due to steam pressure. The loss of water does add to shrinkage during cure. Some water can be removed by bumping the mold open slightly during cure before the resin gels.

There is nothing special about 100C when it comes to composite processing. 100C is just the boiling point of pure water at 14.7 psia. In composite processing the pressure is rarely 14.7 psia, and the water is dissolved in resin. The major problem with moisture is the magnifying effects it has on air bubbles that may be present. But moisture or other volatile material can be very helpful in removing air when there is a path for gasses to move to the vacuum port.

Cold traps can be used to remove some water or volatiles from the vacuumm line before the vacuum pump, but that requires chilling to -100C or so to be effective. This is common practice in laboratories, but I have never seen it done in composites production.

The purpose of venting vacuum at 20 psig is to avoid excessive resin bleed during cure due to volatile pressure pushing resin toward the vacuum source as bubbles grow in the resin. This is a valid procedure when the resin is hot and fluid, but when the resin is still cool and semi solid and has not started to flow yet, all it does is allow air the flow back into the permeable pores in the composite part. Cold debulking can still be useful for removing large air pockets between plies, but warm debulking is usually far more effective (but time consuming).

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close