Resin injection instead of underpinning?
Resin injection instead of underpinning?
(OP)
I'm pouring pile caps that are about 4' below an adjacent wall. Normally, we would underpin the adjacent wall to avoid undermining it. Pretty straightforward. But the contractor wants to do pressure grouting (or resin injection, geopolymer injection, whatever it's called). I'm not very familiar with this method but all my research shows that it's used for strengthening and improving bearing capacity of soils, not actual underpinning. Can it be used for underpinning? And does anyone have any articles or drawings showing it can be used or not used in this capacity? (For drawings, I looked around some public works stuff but couldn't come up with anything.)
Sketch below. Ignore the notes, just showing the general idea.
Sketch below. Ignore the notes, just showing the general idea.
Talk To Other Members
RE: Resin injection instead of underpinning?
Questions:
What is the soil - clay, sand? Will the soil be permeable enough to accept the injection?
What is the construction of the wall and its footing - concrete, rubble stone, concrete block (grouted or not)?
What type of piles will be installed and how - driven, drilled?
How deep below the existing wall footing do you need to dig?
How big and thick are the pile caps? Will the tops of the pile caps be above or below the bottom of the wall footing?
www.PeirceEngineering.com
RE: Resin injection instead of underpinning?
Type of wall: brick. Type of footing: Not sure yet, will dig test pits at some point. It's either concrete or rubble stone based on my experience of footings in this area. Though I don't really do different procedures with standard underpinning whether it's rubble or concrete.
Piles: drilled though soil and socketed into rock. No driving. They are 9 5/8" steel tube in the cased portion (about 10' long) with 5' rock socket.
Depth: bottom of pile cap is about 4' below existing wall. Pile caps are about 2' thick (not my design, I would've made them thicker) so their top is below the existing wall as well, though they'll have concrete wall above.
RE: Resin injection instead of underpinning?
Permeation grouting practical feasibility -i.e. groutability- is a function of soil type, soil density, soil permeability and grout properties. Colloidal silica, sodium silicates, resins, and micro-fine cements are normally employed in medium-to-fine sands or coarse silts where the grouting is almost impossible using cement-based grouts
To evaluate groutability when the grout is a suspension, simple empirical equations are in use. Most developments are based on Terzaghi filter criteria, for instance, the equation proposed by Krizek et al.[45]: N=D10soil/D95grout>8
where d10,soil and d95,grout are the grain sizes corresponding to 10% soil and 95% grout passing fraction, respectively. When this ratio is higher than 8, permeation is deemed to be possible.
the above is stolen from a paper but provides good info.
Although its seems that grouting could be used, I just dont know if it would be quicker or more economical and underpinning the pile caps....
RE: Resin injection instead of underpinning?
RE: Resin injection instead of underpinning?
I would not try any type of injection or grouting in uncontrolled fill containing debris. Underpin the wall.
www.PeirceEngineering.com
RE: Resin injection instead of underpinning?
RE: Resin injection instead of underpinning?
Yes - MSL - that can be your very valid argument to steer away from it. As debris are included, you dont now what you are grouting.