Enggrl
Structural
- May 19, 2023
- 1
I was hired to visit a home where another engineer designed an addition. The stamping engineer disappeared and is unreachable. The contractor and architect were disagreeing on if the addition was built per the engineers specs.
I went to the home under the signed contract that stated, I was there only to note any discrepancies between the built conditions and the engineers drawings. I specifically said in the contract I would not be reviewing the stamped drawings for code compliance.
While on site, I noticed significant deficient items, some of which were detailed wrong in the stamped structural set. Because I wanted to be transparent and ethical, I added those obvious items to my report. I did not review the entire drawing set for code compliance since this was not what I was hired for and the set was stamped by another engineer.
The owner then hired me to create details to fix 2 of the items I noted in my report. One item was due to the contractor not following the set and the other was due to the stamped set not meeting code. In the contract for these details I do not agree to stamp my details.
The owner now wants me to stamp and sign my 2 details. I feel as though I should not add my stamp since I am only taking responsibility for 2 conditions within the entire addition and my original fee did not include the liability of stamped the details. In Ohio, residential project do not require a PE stamp. I do not want to become liable for the entire project when there were obvious code deficiencies.
Would you stamp the details? If so, would you charge an additional fee?
I went to the home under the signed contract that stated, I was there only to note any discrepancies between the built conditions and the engineers drawings. I specifically said in the contract I would not be reviewing the stamped drawings for code compliance.
While on site, I noticed significant deficient items, some of which were detailed wrong in the stamped structural set. Because I wanted to be transparent and ethical, I added those obvious items to my report. I did not review the entire drawing set for code compliance since this was not what I was hired for and the set was stamped by another engineer.
The owner then hired me to create details to fix 2 of the items I noted in my report. One item was due to the contractor not following the set and the other was due to the stamped set not meeting code. In the contract for these details I do not agree to stamp my details.
The owner now wants me to stamp and sign my 2 details. I feel as though I should not add my stamp since I am only taking responsibility for 2 conditions within the entire addition and my original fee did not include the liability of stamped the details. In Ohio, residential project do not require a PE stamp. I do not want to become liable for the entire project when there were obvious code deficiencies.
Would you stamp the details? If so, would you charge an additional fee?