×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Pre-engineered building foundation (thrust)

Pre-engineered building foundation (thrust)

Pre-engineered building foundation (thrust)

(OP)
I am detailing columns and footings for a pre-engineered metal building. This building will sit on a concrete foundation wall with a continuous footing. The plans show a detail at the column locations for a wall bump-out that is two inches bigger, all around, than the base plates for the building columns. Because the size and location of the columns were dependant on the building manufacturer, this is all the information that the plans contain.

I now have the building details provided by the building supplier. The frame reactions shown include a 12 kip horizontal thrust (DL + LL)at the baseplates. If I carry this load in the columns only, assuming that the soil offers no resistance, then I end up needing relatively large footings to accomodate this load.

How does one normally carry this load? Do you assume that the adjacent foundation wall carries it to the soil and the soil resists it via active pressure? Or, do you anchor the floor slab to the wall and take out the thrust this way? (This is what I am considering).

The building is a tapered rigid frame with a 48 foot out to out span, with bays at 12 and 15 foot spacings. The top of the foundation wall (and top of finish floor) is about 4.5' above grade, and extends another 4' below grade. The floor slab will consist of a slab on grade.

RE: Pre-engineered building foundation (thrust)

RRBegin,

Check out Thread No. 256-46157 in the Foundation Engineering Forum, it discusses various design alternatives.  You also must consider the effect of having your building columns 4.5' above finished floor.  This will induce moments into your column design.

Just an observation, if your bay spacings are only 12'-15', the 12 kip horizontal load seams a little high to me even for a 48' wide building.  What is your eave height? I assume the loadings were provided to you by the building manufacturer?

RE: Pre-engineered building foundation (thrust)

(OP)
jheidt2543-

How do I locate the thread? I tried using the search engine, but it came up with "hundreds" of matches.

In response to your comments/questions:

I designed the column for the full height (8.5'), assuming that the walls, soil, and floor provided no support and the column base was fixed. Needless to say, I end up needing a fairly well reinforced column.

I was a little surprised at the magnitude of the thrust, also. The loads, that were provided by the manufacturer, were for a building with an eave height of 11'. The live load that induced the majority of this load is actually the snow load, which in my part of the world is 30 psf on the horizontal projection of the roof. (Hmm, thats only about 11,000 lbs vertical per column) Can the thrust load be greater than the vertical load?

Thanks for the input and (I hope) follow up.

Ron

RE: Pre-engineered building foundation (thrust)

Have you never heard of "Hairpins"?  Wrap the rebar around the anchor bolts and out into the concrete floor at a 30 degree angle each leg.  12kips No problem.

RE: Pre-engineered building foundation (thrust)

RRBegin,

If you go to Search, type in "Hair Pins" and click on "Key Word Search" it will take you to a search screen.  On that screen you will have a number of obtions to select from.  Use the ones that check all forum and all dates.  That search should return two threads, #256-46157 and #507-39027, both of which discuss metal building foundations.  The three alternatives are hair pins, tie-rods and concrete foundations reinforced for overturning.


Hair pins work just fine, but in your case the hair pins would be at the floor level and your column at 4.5' above the floor.  So, there is some added moment in the column to account for.  You also have to make sure that the floor slab is poured either before the building goes up or certainly before the snow load is applied to the roof. Because, without the floor poured, you have no hair pin capacity.

The Metal Building Dealers Association has a small handbook that discusses this and other topics related to metal buildings that may still be in print.

RE: Pre-engineered building foundation (thrust)

(OP)
Thanks everyone, this information was exactly what I needed.

Ron

RE: Pre-engineered building foundation (thrust)

(OP)
Sorry, me again.

Can anyone give me the url for a detail?

Thanks,

Ron

RE: Pre-engineered building foundation (thrust)

Another source of information on the design construction and etc for metal buildings is the MBMA handbook. it was not terribly expensive and has some good data, or at least i thought it did.

RE: Pre-engineered building foundation (thrust)

I always use rebar ties within a concrete beam (say, 8"H x 12"W) directly beneath the floor slab.  Of course, the bars are hook anchored to opposing piers.  Size the bars to keep stress low, reduces elongation.  Use ties at bar splices.

Hairpins don't work on paper, so I don't use them.

RE: Pre-engineered building foundation (thrust)

Stumpy,

Please explain your statement that "hair pins don't work on paper".  There are an hundreds, if not thousands, of buildings built using hair pins.

RE: Pre-engineered building foundation (thrust)

place rebar between concrete floor and foundation wall; also place rebar between concrete flooring and any pedestal to the column footing if design calls for them.  These tie rods will reduce the moment that causes the bearing pressure exerted by footing on the ground and also you get to reduce the size of the footing.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close