×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Stirrups

Stirrups

Stirrups

(OP)
I was looking at SE exam problems and ran into a situation. They give a standard problem where we determine the stirrup spacing based on the necessary ΦVs, then compare it to the maximum spacing allowed by the equations of the code, etc. However, I always considered that the 1st stirrup has to be 1/2 the maximum spacing for the Vu at distance d from the face of the column. To my surprise, and chagrin, the "correct" answer did not apply this standard practice that I have been taught in college, I see in textbooks, and have been practicing for more than a decade. So is it a mistake by the NCEES or was I taught that wrong?

RE: Stirrups

What is their correct answer?

-----*****-----
So strange to see the singularity approaching while the entire planet is rapidly turning into a hellscape. -John Coates

-Dik

RE: Stirrups

(OP)
The ΦVs requires 12.68" spacing, the d/2 is 10.75". Given the above, I picked the answer that is 6" because it 1/2 the 12" (truncated) given by the ΦVs required, and it is safely shorter than d/2. Their correct answer is 10". My configuration would have been 6" for the 1st spacing and then continue with 10". I would not start with 10".

RE: Stirrups

I would have started with 6", then 12". But since d/2 is more than 10", I suppose they can justify 10" as the correct answer.

RE: Stirrups

(OP)
@hikie66, I would have started w/ 6" and then keep it down to 10 per code, and that would have been my design, but I don't see how they justify the 1st being 10. Perhaps that is "since 10<12 and we start and continue w/ a value lower than the minimum calculated spacing for ΦVs, the spacing is adequately dense at that location already."

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close