Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Which CAESAR stress output to use for DNV/PD5500 high cycle fatigue analysis.

Which CAESAR stress output to use for DNV/PD5500 high cycle fatigue analysis.

Which CAESAR stress output to use for DNV/PD5500 high cycle fatigue analysis.

Hi, I’m looking for some clarification on a point.

I have read around this topic quite extensively and think I have gleaned the knowledge I require but I have not found an explicit answer to my query without getting too bogged down in the theory.

The query is: which stress we should use from CAESAR “stresses extended” output for our input to DNV/PD5500 high cycle fatigue analysis.

I am not using the CAESAR ASME high cycle fatigue module so the stress values in question are those output from the regular CAESAR “stresses extended” load case output.

I am running various different load cases to capture pressure fluctuations, temperature fluctuations, slug loads etc etc to generate stresses for input to our PD5500 analysis.

CAESAR outputs two stress values, the B31.3 “Code Stress” and the “Max Stress Intensity”.

I believe that it is the “Max Stress Intensity” stress value that we should be using (multiplied by some factor (or run an IGE TG12 analysis) to correct the B31.3 SIFS) as our input to PD5500 high cycle fatigue.

I believe that we should not be using the B31.3 “Code Stress” value as our input to PD5500 high cycle fatigue because it does not take account of the radial and hoop stresses that should be considered as part of our fatigue analysis.

Two questions:

1. Is my train of thought correct on this?

2. Given that there is pressure in the pipes, is there any argument or justification for using the B31.3 “Code Stress” values for input to a PD5500 high cycle fatigue analysis?

Your opinions would be gratefully received,

RE: Which CAESAR stress output to use for DNV/PD5500 high cycle fatigue analysis.

Ok I have had a look at this again and I think I can rephrase the questions.

1) When CAESAR produces a fatigue stress report for the FAT case can anyone confirm that, for the B31.3 piping code the "code stress" listed is based on the "Max Stress Intensity" and that this is the stress that CAESAR has used to calculate the stress range?

2) Following the logic from question 1, If we use PD5500 to do the high cycle fatigue analysis of our piping as per DNV-RP-D101 paragraph 3.12.5(d) then is it correct to use the "Max Stress Intensity" from CAESAR's "Stresses Extended" output and not the "Code stress" (because the codes stress in the "stresses extended" output is the B31.3 code stress which DOES NOT take account of the hoop stress which is required to be considered for fatigue analysis)?

My confusion is that there seems to be two "code stresses" listed, one code stress for the FAT case which is based on the max stress intensity and another code stress for the stresses extended output which is based on B31.3.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close