×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Electric incinerator

Electric incinerator

Electric incinerator

(OP)
Hello everyone

We are dealing with process design of caustic treatment of LPG from mercaptans. Our issue concerns spent air of caustic regeneration. We have no fired heater nearby to route this in firebox and would not like to use fired incinerator. Please advice links to options:
- an incinerator with electric "burner" instead of fired one
- treatment on a small separate open elevated flare
Please note that spent air flowrate is 50-200 kg/h and it contains only traces of VOC and we do not need high degree of destruction as low odor threshold of disulfides is the only issue we faced. We are currently modelling a emissions dispersion to find out limits. But currently I would suggest 98% destruction is enough. It is unlikely will be more 99%.

P.S. Activated carbon and chemical adsorbent options were already rejected.

RE: Electric incinerator

How far is the nearest fired heater where you can combust this stream ? - this option would be ideal if piping can be made self draining.

RE: Electric incinerator

(OP)
We know. Possible options related for firebox were studied and rejected by Decision Makers.

RE: Electric incinerator

(OP)
@pierreick
"The bug of choice is the thiobacillus—small bacteria that call sewage or soil home and reduce hydrogen sulfide into odorless sulfate. In this form of a biotrickling filter, thiobacillus-covered sponges are installed in what used to be a chemical scrubber. Certain conditions, such as proper moisture, pH, temperature, and pressure, must be maintained within the scrubber to keep the microbes functioning optimally."
We considered biofilter and decided that cost of conditioning might be the most expensive option. Unpredictable pathogen threat was another reason to reject this option as there are no proven references for use in our type of process. Negative experience in bioengineering concerned BP's Deepwater platform was a strong argument.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close