×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Ventilated Tray + Ventilated Covers = Free-Air Rating or De-rate?

Ventilated Tray + Ventilated Covers = Free-Air Rating or De-rate?

Ventilated Tray + Ventilated Covers = Free-Air Rating or De-rate?

(OP)
Sometimes I hate the NEC.

So I know that if I have a ladder or ventilated tray that has a SOLID cover top, I need to de-rate by almost 60% or so.

But the NEC rules don't cover the scenario of a ventilated cable tray used with a VENTILATED tray cover. In this scenario, can I use free-air ratings? Ofcourse I'll be maintaining 1OD separation between cables.

RE: Ventilated Tray + Ventilated Covers = Free-Air Rating or De-rate?

The way I read the standard and subsequent derate requirements, if there is _any surface_ within 1 (insulated) cable diameter, it's not free air. Especially if the surface is conductive, magnetic, or both.

Converting energy to motion for more than half a century

RE: Ventilated Tray + Ventilated Covers = Free-Air Rating or De-rate?

According [for information only]
ANSI/NEMA WC 51-2009/ICEA P-54-440-2009
AMPACITIES OF CABLES INSTALLED IN CABLE TRAYS
3.4 CORRECTION FACTORS FOR TRAY COVERS
The following table provides ampacity correction factors for trays employing covers. The adjustment factors represent worst case conditions where the air gaps between the cable mass and cover are greater than ½ inch. For an air gap spacing less than ½ inch the thermal resistance of the air gap decreases dramatically resulting in an increase in the multiplier.
From Table 3-3 the derating factor is about 80-85%. Ventilated Flanged may be 82-87% but it depends on many other conditions and NEC is a better source, in my opinion.

RE: Ventilated Tray + Ventilated Covers = Free-Air Rating or De-rate?

(OP)
thanks Gr8blu and 7anoter4!

@gr8blu: which standard are you referring to?

@7anoter4: I went through the NEMA standard, it looks like all the equations/etc assume a fully stacked (touching side-by-side) and no adjustment factors for 'spacing' between cables. or am i misreading it?

RE: Ventilated Tray + Ventilated Covers = Free-Air Rating or De-rate?

Indeed, nor NEC neither ANSI WC51 is referring to spaced cables and only solid cover is considered.
If we take 1 copper conductor 600 V/90oC insulation 40oC NEC[full 24" width solid bottom tray] 25 cables, not spaced, according to Art.392.80.2.b,Tb 310.15.B.17, Tb 310.15.B.2 uncovered:414 A;solid unventilated cover: 382 A and ANSI WC51 uncovered:427 A ; covered: 333 A. However, NEC is the law.

RE: Ventilated Tray + Ventilated Covers = Free-Air Rating or De-rate?

More than 90% of one row cables NEC does not permit and for less does not care.
ANSI WC51 consider more than one row but not less.

RE: Ventilated Tray + Ventilated Covers = Free-Air Rating or De-rate?

Sorry. I forgot the NEC article 392.80.1.c and 2.c. which considers ampacity with maintaining space of not less than one diameter between conductors. But without any cover.
However, maintaining spaces in solid bottom cable tray is a problem -we need a frame all 3 feet to maintain the distances.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close