FUBAR during SpaceX booster test 1

• Jul 12, 2022

• #2

Brian Malone

Industrial

Jun 15, 2018

416

The 'anomaly is at around 42:50 +/-

 

Upvote 0 Downvote

• Jul 12, 2022

• #3

EngrPaper

Mechanical

Feb 5, 2018

121

Not really FUBAR just FUB(some)R. Unfortunate setback but they'll iterate past it.

 

Upvote 0 Downvote

• Jul 12, 2022

• Thread starter
• #4

IRstuff

Aerospace

Jun 3, 2002

44,773

One person's FU is another person's "successful data collection;" it's just a matter of spin/perspective.

TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvg

faq731-376 forum1529 Entire Forum list

http://www.eng-tips.com/forumlist.cfm

 

Upvote 0 Downvote

• Jul 12, 2022

1
• #5

Latexman

Chemical

Sep 24, 2003

6,945

"Whoa!" was so appropriate, and clean for a 4 letter word.

Good Luck,
Latexman

 

Upvote 0 Downvote

• Jul 12, 2022

• #6

itsmoked

Electrical

Feb 18, 2005

19,114

Looks so much like what would happen if you puked out a stochiometric mixture without igniting it.

Then ignited it...


Seems like this could be a re-occurring issue with this particular design.

Keith Cress
kcress -

http://www.flaminsystems.com

 

Upvote 0 Downvote

• Jul 12, 2022

• #7

TugboatEng

Marine/Ocean

Nov 1, 2015

11,844

Maybe they're trying to reduce particulate emissions?

 

Upvote 0 Downvote