Driver assistance tech effectiveness
Driver assistance tech effectiveness
(OP)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30543454/
Vehicles equipped with both autonomous emergency braking and lane departure warning were 23% less likely to crash than those not equipped (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.81), controlling for model year, vehicle size and body type. Autonomous emergency braking and lane departure warning generally occur together, making it difficult to tease apart their individual effects. Blind spot detection was associated with a 14% reduction in crashes after controlling for the presence of autonomous emergency braking and lane departure warning (HR =0.86; 95% CI, 0.744-0.99). Differences were observed by vehicle type and crash type. The combined effect of autonomous emergency braking and lane departure warning was greater in newer model vehicles: Equipped vehicles were 13% less likely to crash (HR =0.87; 95% CI, 0.79-0.95) among 2014 model year vehicles versus 34% less likely to crash (HR =0.66; 95% CI, 0.57-0.77) among 2017 model year vehicles.
This is a good study (statistically) and seems to show that the blind spot warning (which I like), automatic emergency braking (which I am meh about) and lane departure warning, which I use for giggles are effective.
Vehicles equipped with both autonomous emergency braking and lane departure warning were 23% less likely to crash than those not equipped (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.81), controlling for model year, vehicle size and body type. Autonomous emergency braking and lane departure warning generally occur together, making it difficult to tease apart their individual effects. Blind spot detection was associated with a 14% reduction in crashes after controlling for the presence of autonomous emergency braking and lane departure warning (HR =0.86; 95% CI, 0.744-0.99). Differences were observed by vehicle type and crash type. The combined effect of autonomous emergency braking and lane departure warning was greater in newer model vehicles: Equipped vehicles were 13% less likely to crash (HR =0.87; 95% CI, 0.79-0.95) among 2014 model year vehicles versus 34% less likely to crash (HR =0.66; 95% CI, 0.57-0.77) among 2017 model year vehicles.
This is a good study (statistically) and seems to show that the blind spot warning (which I like), automatic emergency braking (which I am meh about) and lane departure warning, which I use for giggles are effective.
Cheers
Greg Locock
New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?
RE: Driver assistance tech effectiveness
I've been waiting for a scheme that would watch the driver and ensure they are actively looking around them as they drive and not down at a cell phone or fixated with some other item - the classic rubber-necking crash cause. This would also catch sleepy driving, drunk driving, and medical problems. We'll see what privacy concerns that people will claim if that isn't simply real-time processed, but is retained for the few minutes before a crash is detected.
RE: Driver assistance tech effectiveness
TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvg
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers Entire Forum list http://www.eng-tips.com/forumlist.cfm
RE: Driver assistance tech effectiveness
The other objection i have to Lane Keeping is that corrections often hint at an ice covered surface because the steering wheel 'feels' different (reduction in effort), and it feels just like the loss of traction on an ice covered road. Sometimes, wet, too.
Sure it's switchable on and off, but if I need to jump over the seat into the back storage area to fetch a beer, it comes in handy !
RE: Driver assistance tech effectiveness