Humans are fallible and make mistakes. To avoid this, the standard approach is to automate. Humans can still be a part of automated systems, but they do not make any decisions. Automation is expensive but justified in high volume environments like Amazon.

Packaging is as much of the routing as any manufacturing step.
Your standard packaging instructions need to be spelled out on the order and signed off like any other process.
The operator should not be making decisions, just confirming what the instructions say to do.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, consulting work welcomed

Any more it's cheap to have a photograph of the item to be packed displayed on the screen next to the label printer. Adding a weighing station to see if the item and the box weigh the expected amount would help as would a label reader - use a QR code on the label to simplify that.

there should be a tag on the part stating part# and job # and any other pertinent info.
there should be printed instructions , with part# job# and any other pertinent info,
part and paper work should be reviewed for correct match prior to packaging. there should be a lead verifying it's being done correctly.

There could be machine readable product identifiers; scan the identifier and the label automatically prints out and the packaging is identified for use. Minimize the human element

TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvg
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers Entire Forum list http://www.eng-tips.com/forumlist.cfm

Why not have someone check the label and what’s inside the package just prior to sealing it.
If it’s all done by hand then someone could just do a quick check.

“Do not worry about your problems with mathematics, I assure you mine are far greater.” Albert Einstein

Thanks to all for your inputs. Sadly most of them are way to complex and/or expensive for us to implement them
Deserfox approach is interesting. We can probably do that. I am also thinking of making matching color labels for the inside bags product and the outside box
Our packaging consist of product inside plastic bags (with label) and then, those bags are put inside a cartboard box (with label)
After that, the boxes are put in a conveyour for automatic plastic wrapping and plastic shrinking

Pick tickets with two people checking. One signoff when the box is filled, one signoff before the box is closed and label applied. It doesn't eliminate errors, but it can drastically reduce simple mistakes.

Once there is accountability most people tend to improve performance.

How do you even ensure that plastic bags even have correct labels if you have so many problems further down the line?

A QR code reader is under $100 on Amazon, while 1D barcode readers are even cheaper

TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvg
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers Entire Forum list http://www.eng-tips.com/forumlist.cfm

How do you even ensure that plastic bags even have correct labels if you have so many problems further down the line?

Exactly, I can´t

so lukin you say it's to expensive, yet the company has poor quality control. it's part of doing business. and the cost should be included in the jobs.
read the book quality is free. that is why controls procedures are incorporated. for these type of reasons.

Quote:

Exactly, I can´t

So, remove the errors by automating; how can you afford not to?

TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvg
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers Entire Forum list http://www.eng-tips.com/forumlist.cfm

You should probably also consider that adding a paper label to a plastic anything likely makes it completely unrecyclable.

Keith Cress
kcress - http://www.flaminsystems.com

How much money are these mistakes costing the company?

Aren't these expensive as well?

That should be your first evaluation. With that information, you can then come up with a solution that even if not perfect may save you some of these handling error costs.
Every boss loves that, so it shouldn't be difficult for you to get funding for your improvement projects.

Unless, this is not a problem and the rate of mistake is so low that eliminating it wouldn't be cost effective.

How are your labels being made? Does it come from a database or are they all being put in by hand.

My thought is
Put a barcode on the part being shipped.
Put a barcode on the Box or Package it must be shipped in.
The user scans each bar code with a PC near by
The computer does a cross check to make sure the package and parts match.
If the parts match, the shrink wrapper works.
If the parts do not match the shrink wrapper fails to turn on.

This wouldn't take too much of an investment.
My thought is do something that forces the user to use the system (not just a simple check), this is why I am saying the PC blocks access to the shrink wrapper somehow. (On/Off/Physical Barrier)

Or you can go with the approach that the pc prints a "Verified By: Joe Shmo" label and if a box gets shipped out wrong, discipline the user. (I hate this method).

Hey Sakshi Verma,

I really like the information you provided to avoid packaging mistakes, but I would like to add some more points which should consider & these are :
*accurate measurements when packing your items
*select sensitive materials that won't deteriorate over time
*label each package properly
*expiration dates on packages

https://agnisolar.com/

After spending 20-years in Automation and Packaging industry: KegOBear has the only real solution here.