sl...
We cannot resolve this issue for You with a stock-photo and a few simplified questions... but with reference to 'general experience'... back-to-you, thus.
As I recall, one of the significant factors affecting the Hubble Space Telescope on commissioning... in addition to the primary mirror optical aberration... was that the solar panels had long-term undampened vibrations as the observatory shifted aim-points and it transitioned thru day-night-day-night-etc thermal cycles.
The first HST servicing mission installed the COSTAR for the optics correction; and removed and replaced both solar panels with new massively-improved ones [among a few other important modifications... and maybe something regarding the high-gain/tracking antenna?].
LOTS of engineering lessons have been learned the hard way... and always to extremes in spaceflight. In accordance with the most popular version of 'Murphy's Law'...
“Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong. ... and Murphy was an optimist.
Or... if You insist on not testing/analyzing the antennas and panels... and simply assume your micro/small-Satellite will be immune-to, or otherwise not be significantly affected by vibrations... then I shall quote Clint Eastwood from the movie 'Dirty Harry' [the actual words]...
"You've got to ask yourself one question. 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do you, punk?"
Regards, Wil Taylor
o Trust - But Verify!
o We believe to be true what we prefer to be true. [Unknown]
o For those who believe, no proof is required; for those who cannot believe, no proof is possible. [variation,Stuart Chase]
o Unfortunately, in science what You 'believe' is irrelevant. ["Orion", Homebuiltairplanes.com forum]