×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

PSCC & PFC Measurement Accuracy Using MFT

PSCC & PFC Measurement Accuracy Using MFT

PSCC & PFC Measurement Accuracy Using MFT

(OP)
Hi,

I am curious as to the experience of others in using multifunction testers (primarily designed for insulation resistance measurements) for measuring prospective short-circuit currents with regards to accuracy.

Typically in my company we use the Megger range of MFT (such as MFT-1835) to measure the short-circuit currents on the LV terminals of a new transformer or main switchboard installation.

Recently I have noticed the measured values to be significantly deviated from the theoretical short-circuit current used in the design (design including HV impedances) by upto 50%. This is at the point where it gives me concerns as to the adequacy of the HV protection to operate in all scenarios on a fault between the LV terminals an the first LV protective device.

Can anyone shed any light on similar experiences or recommendation to use a dedicated test unit (I'm not aware of what dedicated units might be used)?

Thanks

RE: PSCC & PFC Measurement Accuracy Using MFT

Is the goal to measure or verify the nameplate short circuit impedance (%Z or Zk) of the transformer to calculate the fault current? If so, you would need to perform an open and short circuit impedance test. Impedance Tests

I doubt you would get anywhere close with a small instrument like what is being used - I'm guessing that it uses a DC source, which may deliver the DC winding resistance, but that's not the Zk. Care should also be taken when attempting a xfmr resistance test, due to high voltages generated by inductive kickback.

There are some tests that are performed in the field in conjunction with Tan Delta / Power Factor tests that can come somewhat close to the nameplate impedance, but are used for determining any mechanical issues in the transformer. Doble has a leakage reactance accessory and Omicron & Megger have something similar.

Sometimes a primary injection test is performed to prove stability of differential protection. In this case a reduced 3 phase source is connected to the HV side of Xfmr, with the secondary shorted out to create current flow. Say 480V on a 138kV HV / 12.47kV LV. I suppose these measurements could be carried out with this method, however one also has to consider that the %Z is given at some nominal temperature and this would need to be compensated for in the final calculations.

RE: PSCC & PFC Measurement Accuracy Using MFT

I have not used it, but perhaps something like the Megger NIM1000 is along the lines of what you are looking for?

RE: PSCC & PFC Measurement Accuracy Using MFT

(OP)
Hi thermionic1,

The goal is to measure the actual short circuit available fault current, inclusive of system impedance. The Megger MFT do this as a live test, automatically by drawing a range of load currents up to several amps and measuring the voltage changes of the source and applying a simple V_nom/Z_meas = PSCC formula.

For reference, by LV I'm referring to <1kV, this question applies to our testing of industrial and distribution transformers in the range 0.5-2MVA (11 or 22kV primary, 415V secondary).

Hi IrishPower,

It does look that may be a more suitable instrument, if there is not some other way of improving our measurement accuracy. I suspect the low current draw of the MFT to be the limitation of accuracy on these size distribution/industrial transformers.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close