×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Why do Pressure Vessels require a greater material thickness than Piping?

Why do Pressure Vessels require a greater material thickness than Piping?

Why do Pressure Vessels require a greater material thickness than Piping?

(OP)
When I look at the minimum thickness calculation in ASME VIII, I notice the calculation requires a greater metal thickness than say B31.3. Even if you account for the same material this is still the case.

This a common issue with chemical plants when they design a small vessel using the Piping code only to learn later that if it was designed to the Pressure vessel standards the minimum required thickness would be greater.

What is the reason for this? Is this because pressure vessels have a greater stored energy compared to piping hence the need for a thicker material?

RE: Why do Pressure Vessels require a greater material thickness than Piping?

Different allowable stress basis, and different Committees doing the Code development.

RE: Why do Pressure Vessels require a greater material thickness than Piping?

Pressure vessels have lots of other stress and forces and also need to have a higher FoS due to the stored energy.

It could easily be that "most" PV's are relatively large with lots of openings, dished ends etc, whereas pipe under pressure is rarely > 48" and in most plants is more likely in 1" to 24".

The two codes don't work well at their extremes.

"This a common issue with chemical plants when they design a small vessel using the Piping code " Is it?? There have been many debates here on whether you can just make something out of pipe to say B31.3 or other code as opposed to ASME VIII and the usual answer is no. PV definition is a legal and safety issue so I don't recognise your phrase as being correct IME.

It annoys me when pig traps on pipelines get designed as a Pressure vessel, because that really is an extension of the pipeline and is universally recognised as such in the pipeline design codes, but for a process plant??

Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.

RE: Why do Pressure Vessels require a greater material thickness than Piping?

(OP)
Those are some good points. I didn't think of the extra nozzles and openings that vessels have unlike pipes. One could argue that pipe contains store energy so for those that design very small vessels with very few openings, it almost seems it can get away with being built as a "pipe".

I know that's not what the code says though.

I agree with you

@LittleInch

RE: Why do Pressure Vessels require a greater material thickness than Piping?

1) The piping and the PV can have the same storage energy.
2) The different allowable stresses between PV and piping are not the cause, they are a consequence.
3) PVs have more complex detail fabrications, so higher risks and more inspections and NDEs are required.
4) Most PVs have longitudinally welded shells, some with two of them.
5) Most PVs are made in the shop. Lifting, transport and erection are other risks.

The above mentioned (and others) are the cause of greater thickness than the piping.

Regards

RE: Why do Pressure Vessels require a greater material thickness than Piping?

Failure modes are different. Sizing is different. Lids are different. Even in the B31 codes, like power vs process piping, allowable stresses and equations are different. One such reason for that is that chemica plant may be located in different areas than power plants, one committee member once told me. Hence risks are different, resulting in other allowables.
And so forth

Huub
- You never get what you expect, you only get what you inspect.

RE: Why do Pressure Vessels require a greater material thickness than Piping?

To OP's point, how are the ASME VIII exemptions determined?

why is a pressure vessel with a diameter less than 6" exempt from the code?

I wish these codes contain more background information on have reached their requirements.

RE: Why do Pressure Vessels require a greater material thickness than Piping?

Buy one of the ASME guide books or the companion guides. They might shed some light on this

Huub
- You never get what you expect, you only get what you inspect.

RE: Why do Pressure Vessels require a greater material thickness than Piping?

I checked and sadly not much information there.

RE: Why do Pressure Vessels require a greater material thickness than Piping?

Which sources did you check? Maybe I can help

Huub
- You never get what you expect, you only get what you inspect.

RE: Why do Pressure Vessels require a greater material thickness than Piping?

I checked the ASME companion guide, read various papers, books regarding pressure vessels. I haven't found the answer yet.

RE: Why do Pressure Vessels require a greater material thickness than Piping?

How are the Section VIII Exemptions determined? By discussion and negotiation among the members of the Subgroup on General Requirements (SG-GR) of Section VIII. Basically, to best understand the logic and reasoning behind the rules, you have to attend the meetings where the Scope is discussed. There are a number of competing interests, and the engineering community (by way of the members of the Code Committees) makes their engineering judgements on what's in the best interest of the public.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close